SOLO VS DUAL

HomerWSmith at lightlink.com HomerWSmith at lightlink.com
Fri Dec 4 19:42:43 EST 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


      SOLO VS DUAL

      Just try to understand the situtation.

      You are in a universe.

      The universe has a swamp in it.

      The swamp has a car in it.

      The car has your body in it.

      Your body has YOU in it.

      YOU now created and HAVE a restimulatable facsimile of the above.

      So does the body and 10 to the gobzillion BT's and Clusters.

      You also have a fair chosen need to stick this facsimile on your
self as a keying in in this life as a solution to a problem, so:

      You are now in a facsimile of a universe, with a swamp in it, with
a car in it, with a body in it, with you in it.

      Lower dual auditing tries to audit either

      1.) the keying in moment of the facsimile in this life as a service
fac, or

      2.) the creation moment of the facsimile many lifetimes ago.

      "Go to the beginning of the incident, grind your nose flat with it,
tell me what happened (running the incident is another incident!), go to
the beginning, grind your nose..." etc until flat or erased.

    Solo using causal conception says:

      Get the idea of a universe.

      Get the idea of a swamp.

      Get the idea of a car.

      Get the idea of a body.

      Get the idea of you.

      Repeat until too ludicrous to consider.

      That will run the creation of the facsimile.

      Now get the idea of needing an excuse that is convincing.

      Get the idea of not needing an excuse that is convincing.

      Run until you can make it either way just by conceiving and
unconceiving of it, needing an excuse.

      You will probably have to alternate between running the creation of
the facsimile and the USE of the facsimile, that puts you WAY down the
whole track, then up here in this life, then WAY down the whole track,
then up here in this life, and causes a loosening up of being able to
move on the track, because each lock up on the track consists of TWO
pieces of track.

      The first piece of track is what was keyed in, and the second piece
of track is when it was keyed in and why.

      All case incidents were created in one moment of time and used
later in another moment of time, so you will have to deal with a
flattened mess of two moments of time making the present time chronic
somatic in your face.

      As usual every incident has a WHAT, WHY, WHEN, and also
a WHO and HOW MANY.

      What happened, why it happened and when it happened.

      What was keyed in, why it was keyed in and when it was keyed in,
(pre speech).

      Also more generally we can say:

      The PAST is WHAT was keyed in.

      The PRESENT is HOW it is being keyed in.

      The FUTURE is WHY it is being keyed in.

      The agency is all in present time.

      But that agency, you, is concerned about the future,
and has access to the past.

      So auditing your FUTURE will blow the service
fac into sight.

      Get the idea of SOME FUTURE.

      Get the idea of NO FUTURE.

      Also the service fac USE is undoubtedly yours, the facsimile is
almost assuredly not, stuff that has happened to you is almost never to
convincing, but stuff that has happened to others or you did to others
is stomach curdling and anyone will accept it as the 'Poor Dear You!'
that you sought, just so they don't have to conceive it any more.

      Thus there are multiple ownerships in each squash in the face
somatic, just as there are two times.

      And then there are God knows how many earlier similars until you
get to basic basic of conceiving being an effect, ruin, disaster,
catastrophe, hysteria, shock, catatonia, oblivion and gone.

      Down below nonexistence the being will be found to be circling
around in Luck, Chance, Fortune, Destiny and Fate.

      High Reponsibility cases in other words.

      Just run them top down.

      Get the idea of NO   LUCK.
      Get the idea of SOME LUCK.

      Maybe add GOOD and BAD to them.

      Get the idea of NO   GOOD FORTUNE.
      Get the idea of SOME GOOD FORTUNE.

      Get the idea of NO    BAD FORTUNE.
      Get the idea of SOME  BAD FORTUNE.

      Run them all.

      The guy who "can't make mockups", this is what he isn't making.

      E/P Inkling of total responsibility.

      But for God's sake don't forget QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, these keep
the bank totally stirred up and hard as a suppressed rock.

      WHO, HOW, WHAT, WHERE, WHY, WHICH, IS IT?  etc.

      Run all trying to answer a question, and trying to question an
answer out of every incident you find, as it is the seeking questions
and answers that ultimately cause CONTINUANCE of anything created.

      So you mockup an blue elephant, who cares.

      But then you start mocking up questions about the elephant.

      Mocking up means causally conceiving.

      Whose elephant is it?

      How did that elephant get here?

      What kind of elephant is it?

      Where the hell am I that there should be a blue elephant there?

      Why is that elephant blue?

      Which elephant is this?

      Is this really an elephant or what?

      You see?

      NOW you have an elephant that not even Ron Hubbard could get rid
of.

      Homer

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY
homer at lightlink.com  Is that too much to ask?   http://www.lightlink.com

>     Solo processing the more difficult parts of case is like you
>pulling your car out of the swamp, with a rope.

Homer Said:
No, its worse than that, its like you putting the universe and the
swamp and your car there, and then running the car intentionally into the
swamp enough times to get the ludicrosity of it and it vanish as if it
never happened.

Solo is a top down activity.

Dual is a bottom up activity.

Homer

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Fri Dec  4 19:42:43 EST 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore988.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but 
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFWYjMDURT1lqxE3HERAirVAKCG8KQMxG1RLcLI0kumx7cFwQN8NgCfeBmq
TYstJMvsNoFQS9u7/CQFPFw=
=o+4e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
HomerWSmith-L mailing list
HomerWSmith-L at mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l


More information about the Clear-L mailing list