Clearing Archive Roboposter roboposter at lightlink.com
Thu Feb 5 00:06:02 EST 2015

>From International Viewpoints (IVy) Issue 7 - August 1992
Four Points to the Triangle
By Terry E. Scott, England

LRH's discovery of Affinity, Reality, Communication (ARC) was 
brilliant and valuable. He also found that a product of ARC is 

Today, we can add further data.

Although Theta, in truth, has no divisions, it has created games and 
universes through conception and manifestation of sub-divisions. These 
include duality, which can be expressed in many ways - such as creator 
and perceiver, originator and responder and, important here, intention 
and understanding.

In terms of the ARC triangle, A, R, C are three components, and there 
is a fourth. It is Intention, when the yang (male, creative) side of 
the duality is involved; Understanding or, more accurately, 
Duplication when yin (female, responsive and receptive) is emphasised.

We end up with IARC, Intention, Affinity (emotion and admiration), 
Actualities, Reach (communication), plus UARC, Understanding 
(duplication), Affinity (aesthetics, emotion), reality (agreement), 
communication (and thought as distinct from thinkingness).


These data have long been extant in astrology, where they are known in 
vague form as fire (intention/duplication), earth (reality), air 
(communication), water (affinity). It takes a knowledge of the Tech to 
really sort out astrology.

Theta is One. It can consider itself to be dualities - such as Cause 
(yang, manifesting as masculinity on a mest level) and Receipt point, 
responder (yin, feminine spiritual qualities). The duality then is 
expressed in terms of four aspects: IARC and UARC. Since I and U are 
aspects of knowingness, one could say KARC.

In universes, there are levels of manifestation. Theta can also 
express KARC as product: energy, space, matter and time, respectively.

Theta is Three ... Beingness (as identity), doingness, havingness. 
These, too, are found in astrology, as Cardinal, Mutable and Fixed. 
Be-Do-Have are the tools by which the thetan runs a game, and also 
work out as create (start), maintain (change), complete (stop).

By deciding to continue a moment in the ever-changing present, goal 
and game are begun. Otherwise, one would have "Walked on" in the 
present, moment by moment: continuous as-is-ness, without altering any 
moment to create a goal.


Astrologically, invoking be-do-have creates an identity (seen in the 
horoscope) and, if it is a game of being-human, a lifetime.

The point of such be-do-have can be a specific goal. Or it can be a 
state of havingness that offers a benefit. One could say that the MEST 
universe is a continuing benefit and havingness, not an end goal.

A benefit can also be a continuing accumulation that, when in time its 
maximum capacity is reached, may be discharged. Like feeding mest 
electricity into a capacitor for several seconds, then discharging 
that energy through a tube, in a millisecond - as in an electronic 
flashgun for a camera.

KARC can be applied to the Tech broadly. For example, in relation to 
the trio processes, "Recall a time when you felt affinity for 
someone", "Recall a time that was really real", "Recall a time when 
you were in good communication with someone".

We can add the fourth component - something like: "Recall a time when 
you had clear intention" + "Recall a time when you understood". Or, as 
a single line: "Recall a time when you knew".

One can handle hung-up goals, purposes and benefits by locating the 
alter-is moment that gave them birth, running it simply. If the thing 
does not unmock, look for an earlier, similar alteration - same 
subject matter. This is not engram running, so look for an event 
containing alteration, initiation, intention, duplication as the vital 

Example: the antique vase the preclear cannot forget. He saw it on 
show, postulated "I must have that vase", worked extra hard to make 
the money needed, bought it, and was happy (havingness, benefit) until 
it was lost or damaged or became dust. For this preclear, the vase is 
an aesthetic on a chain of earlier/similar aesthetics.

The Tech we have inherited extends into much complexity of case, but 
the thetan is Simple in a grand sense. But the most powerful tech is a 
simplicity that can be applied remarkably low down in the case yet 
works powerfully at high levels.


Case is built upon goals and benefits concerning specific identities, 
which comprise particular beingness, doingness and havingness. The 
confusion of benefits and liabilities in identities individually and 
in series are the things to resolve in the preclear. 

Astrological connection

More on the astrology of all this - and, to avoid misunderstoods, 
either look up the terms I shall use in a good basic book on astrology 
(otherwise this article would stretch on somewhat) or skip the next 
few paragraphs altogether.

The three inner planets can be associated with beingness, Sun stands 
for viewpoints and intention/understanding, and astrologically is of 
the element Fire. Mercury represents communication, reach, 
thinkingness, connectedness (thus logic), and can be linked with the 
element Air.

Venus symbolizes affinity, emotion, aesthetics, and its element is 
Water. And Earth, the one the astrologers overlook, stands for 
reality, actuality, agreement - element earth (coincidentally).

The next set of planets are Mars, "Aster" (in this system, just the 
asteroids), Jupiter, Saturn - associated respectively with 
intention/understanding, communication, affinity, reality, but this 
time in terms of doingness. Then come the "havingness planets", Uranus 
(I/U), Neptune (C), Pluto (A), and a hypothetical "Zee" (R).

The level one can call real astrology is an interface between theta 
and mest, a sort of paraphysics. I have been studying it for 35 years, 
and it is a long way from the sort of rubbish one gets in newspapers 
and women's magazines.

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Feb  5 00:06:02 EST 2015 
Send mail to archive at lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but 
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY
homer at lightlink.com  Is that too much to ask?   http://www.lightlink.com

More information about the Clear-L mailing list