Clearing Archive Roboposter roboposter at lightlink.com
Wed Feb 25 12:06:11 EST 2015

>From International Viewpoints (IVy) Issue 6 - May 1992
Editorial note: I have had a couple of complaints about authors using 
pseudonyms. Now: John Dorne has come as a pseudonym. When I asked for 
permission to use his real name, I got the following response, which I 
think may interest readers. From now on I am willing to use 

As for Pseudonyms
By John Dorne, Denmark

Well, we can talk about it.

Firstly I think there is a big difference between being anonymous in a 
political, power game or undercover situation, and using a pseudonym 
when you write for entertainment or perform on the stage.

Secondly pseudonyms may have different functions that have nothing to 
do with being in hiding.

A stage name is chosen to be acceptable and easy to duplicate, not to 
hide an identity. Authors use it too. Like Marilyn Monroe, Mark Twain, 
El Ron.

Which last shows how a pseudonym can be used to communicate or be 
compatible with a certain type of writing. S›ren Kierkegaard used this 
a lot, writing for different magazines about different kinds of 
subjects under different names, each being tied up with a particular 
frame of mind.

Pseudonyms are also used by well-known persons who want to write 
something which they consider not serious enough for their station in 
life or otherwise incompatible with some image they want to maintain. 
It has been theorized that the name (and person) of William 
Shakespeare has been used to hide the true identity of the author, an 
English Nobleman, or Queen.

As for myself, I want to promote myself as a business man, primarily, 
so I don't promote myself as an author.

 Some ideas presented in the stories might be considered incompatible 
with the mind of a good business man and of course would be, since I 
do not necessarily write from my own viewpoint.

Secondly, I would like some spontaneous reactions to my stories by 
people who do not know me, or rather: don't know they know me.

In spite of all these considerations, I am not completely unwilling to 
consider the matter again, if you think you have valid arguments. 

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Feb 25 12:06:10 EST 2015 
Send mail to archive at lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but 
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY
homer at lightlink.com  Is that too much to ask?   http://www.lightlink.com

More information about the Clear-L mailing list