THE DICOM PROCESS/ codes

Homer Wilson Smith HomerWSmith at lightlink.com
Fri May 27 16:41:02 EDT 2016


    David you are wasting my time, I have no idea who or
what I am talking to.

    If you take what you say seriously, then you need help.

    If you are trolling, I have no interest in it.

    So get serious and let me KNOW and have confidence that you
are being serious.

    Homer

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY
homer at lightlink.com  Is that too much to ask?   http://www.lightlink.com

On Fri, 27 May 2016, David M Pelly wrote:

> 
> 
> There is no discussion necessary.
> 
> The facts are the facts.
> 
> Roosters control planet earth.
> 
> There is nothing more important than  roosters.
> 
> You heard it from me first.
> 
> This is one the greatest discoveries of all time.
> 
> David
> 
> 
> 
> > Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 21:38:00 -0400
> > From: HomerWSmith at lightlink.com
> > To: david.pelly at hotmail.ca
> > CC: homerwsmith at lightlink.com
> > Subject: RE: THE DICOM PROCESS/ codes
> >
> >
> > I have redirected your e-mails to me to clear-l directly
> > whereby you can discuss these matters with others who are so inclined.
> >
> > Homer
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
> > (607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
> > homer at lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
> >
> > On Thu, 26 May 2016, David M Pelly wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, that means if there were no roosters the sun would never come up.
> > >
> > > And there would be no life on earth.
> > >
> > > So we owe our lives to roosters.
> > >
> > > Thank God for roosters.
> > >
> > >
> > > That is called intelligent design.
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > > > Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:55:05 -0400
> > > > From: HomerWSmith at lightlink.com
> > > > To: david.pelly at hotmail.ca
> > > > CC: homerwsmith at lightlink.com
> > > > Subject: RE: THE DICOM PROCESS/ codes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Does that mean the rooster CAUSES the sun to come up?
> > > >
> > > > Homer
> > > >
> > > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
> > > > (607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
> > > > homer at lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 25 May 2016, David M Pelly wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You said the sun comes up and the rooster crows.
> > > > >
> > > > > I said it is the other way around.
> > > > >
> > > > > The rooster crows and then the sun comes up.
> > > > >
> > > > > The rooster crows a couple of hours before the sun rises.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Look it up.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 19:12:40 -0400
> > > > > > From: HomerWSmith at lightlink.com
> > > > > > To: david.pelly at hotmail.ca
> > > > > > CC: homerwsmith at lightlink.com
> > > > > > Subject: RE: THE DICOM PROCESS/ codes
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What was the point about the rooster and the sun again?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
> > > > > > (607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
> > > > > > homer at lightlink.com Is that too much to ask?
> http://www.lightlink.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 25 May 2016, David M Pelly wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What about the email I sent you earlier on Black Fives?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > David
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 15:16:31 -0400
> > > > > > > > From: HomerWSmith at lightlink.com
> > > > > > > > To: david.pelly at hotmail.ca
> > > > > > > > CC: homerwsmith at lightlink.com
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: THE DICOM PROCESS/ codes
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Nope, he kept it secret and one had to sign a non disclosure
> > > > > > > > agreement to receive the tech, which was against my codes :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Homer
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix -
> Lightlink
> > > > > > > > (607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
> > > > > > > > homer at lightlink.com Is that too much to ask?
> > > http://www.lightlink.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 May 2016, David M Pelly wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Homer,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Do you know what Alan Walters' codes technology is?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I think Zivorad has something similar?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Do you know that tech and how to find a person's codes?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > David
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > From: HomerWSmith at lightlink.com
> > > > > > > > > > To: homerwsmith-l at mailman.lightlink.com
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: THE DICOM PROCESS
> > > > > > > > > > Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 23:17:57 -0400
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > > > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > THE DICOM PROCESS
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The dicom process involves any dicom of importance in a
> > > person's
> > > > > > > > > > life, it might take him 40 years to find out what dicoms
> to
> > > run,
> > > > > but
> > > > > > > once
> > > > > > > > > > he has them, it won't stop running until he's extroverted
> up
> > > into
> > > > > > > GAMES,
> > > > > > > > > > ACTION, SENSATIONS, COURAGE, and EXHILARATION or higher on
> the
> > > > > tone
> > > > > > > scale.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > TONE SCALE
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/electra/tone.memo
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > A dicom is a DIchotomy of Comparable but Opposite
> Magnitude.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Dicoms can range from the simple and obvious like, Love
> and
> > > Hate,
> > > > > > > > > > Fear and Peace, Good and Bad/Evil, Beauty and Ugly, to the
> > > truly
> > > > > weird
> > > > > > > > > > like Immortal Criminality and Indecent Innocence.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Immortal Criminality is the last tone a spirit is in
> before it
> > > > > goes
> > > > > > > > > > to sleep forever in a human body.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Indecent Innocence is the meatball that results.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Sometimes the true dicom pairs are not obvious, for
> example
> > > fear
> > > > > > > > > > and peace might better be run as fear and confidence, a
> subtle
> > > > > change
> > > > > > > > > > but more in align with actual whole track charge.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Case mostly exists by the preclear pulling in the past to
> deal
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > his future. If he had no concerns about his future he
> wouldn't
> > > > > have a
> > > > > > > > > > 'case' and he wouldn't be using his past or its recordings
> or
> > > > > > > > > > computations to try to increase his chances of survival in
> the
> > > > > future.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Despair is when a being has given up on logical solutions
> and
> > > has
> > > > > > > > > > taken to random usually violent action to solve a critical
> > > life or
> > > > > > > death
> > > > > > > > > > present time problem.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Using the past to deal with the future is about as close
> to
> > > > > despair
> > > > > > > > > > as despair comes.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Therefore most preclears will come into session completely
> > > buried
> > > > > > > > > > in their past with little cognizance of what is troubling
> them
> > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > their future, and zero understandings about how they are
> > > pulling
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > past in present time to deal with that future.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > WHAT is in restimulation is the past.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > HOW it is in restimulation is wholy in the present, his
> fair
> > > > > chosen
> > > > > > > > > > choice to make it so, self covert as it might be.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > WHY it is in restimulation is his future which is being
> > > created as
> > > > > > > > > > he conceives it and reacts to it in present time out of
> his
> > > past.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Capiche toi?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Dicoms love to form ANDS, in the preclear's rush to become
> > > crazy
> > > > > > > > > > and remain so, he has taken to dramatizing both sides of
> any
> > > dicom
> > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > the same time, like isometrics.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > An AND is not an indecision, should I go or not go? That's
> > > THINK.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > An AND is a DECISION to both go AND not go. That's ACTION,
> > > albeit
> > > > > > > > > > totally opposed.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > A preclear in a car in an indecision about going or not
> going
> > > will
> > > > > > > > > > alternately hit the accelerator and then hit the brakes,
> then
> > > hit
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > accelerator and then hit the brakes, over and over again
> > > causing
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > car
> > > > > > > > > > to jerk forward then stop, then jerk forward then stop.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The preclear in an AND about not going or going will hit
> the
> > > > > brakes
> > > > > > > > > > AND the accelerator at the same time, pedal to the metal,
> > > forever
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > free.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > With 50 percent of his energy on the brake and the other
> 50
> > > > > percent
> > > > > > > > > > on the accelerator, he has no energy left to read the map.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > He is dead TIRED all day long.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Dicoms won't run out until these ANDS are run out first,
> so on
> > > any
> > > > > > > > > > dicom one needs to assess, for example:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > LOVE AND HATE AT THE SAME TIME FOR EVER FOR FREE.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You don't run one side and then the other, you run both
> sides
> > > at
> > > > > > > > > > the same time!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > When an AND is found the relief will be palpable, the
> preclear
> > > can
> > > > > > > > > > sit there for many minutes while the TA goes up and down
> on
> > > its
> > > > > own.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The phrasing of the assesment might seem silly, but all 3
> > > parts
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > necesssary.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > LOVE AND HATE is the AND.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > FOREVER is the IMMORTALITY of the conception, he is dead
> > > serious
> > > > > > > > > > about never sunsetting this nonsense.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > FOR FREE brings in the power of ETERNALITY to keep this
> thing
> > > > > going
> > > > > > > > > > without further attention for as long as his "immortality"
> > > lasts.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Remember both mortality and immortality are in time and
> are
> > > > > > > > > > apparencies only, as WHILES in time they both draw their
> power
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > Eternality.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Eternality is above time (as the STATIC) and gives its
> power
> > > (as
> > > > > > > > > > the KINETIC) FOR A WHILE to the illusions and delusions of
> > > > > immortality
> > > > > > > > > > and the hells forever that arise from it, and to the
> illusions
> > > and
> > > > > > > > > > delusions of mortality and the apparency of death forever
> that
> > > it
> > > > > > > > > > provides.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In running dicoms we need to run them on the SAME object,
> not
> > > > > > > > > > different objects.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "Get the idea of hating daddy."
> > > > > > > > > > "Get the idea of loving mommy."
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > won't run. Its a one way flow on both mommy and daddy!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > One needs to run,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "Get the idea of hating mommy."
> > > > > > > > > > "Get the idea of loving mommy."
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Then when that is flat, run
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "Get the idea of hating daddy."
> > > > > > > > > > "Get the idea of loving daddy."
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > There is a lot of yap and natter in the Church about only
> > > > > > > > > > running 'in-ARC' processes.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In other words run
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "Spot a time you had good ARC with Mommy."
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > They warn you not to run "out-of-ARC" processes:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "Spot a time you were out of ARC with Mommy."
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yet Hubbard said many times that if you run pleasure
> moments,
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > preclear will drop into pain so you can then run the pain.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Joke is, if you run pain moments, the preclear will run
> into
> > > > > > > > > > pleasure moments!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This is because doing either is runing a one way flow
> which
> > > jams
> > > > > > > > > > and the preclear has no other choice but to be thrown into
> the
> > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > > side, usually violently and cursing.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So why not wise up and simply run both alternately at the
> same
> > > > > > > > > > time.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "Get the idea of being out-of-ARC."
> > > > > > > > > > "Get the idea of being in-ARC."
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Then both will run like wild fire, and each will swing
> into
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > other back and forth rather easily and fluidly.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You always start off with the out-of-ARC because that's
> where
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > preclear is at, and you end off with the in-ARC because
> that's
> > > > > where
> > > > > > > > > > your preclear will be once the two are run for a while.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Remember this HAS to be run with good SYNC, if the
> preclear
> > > has
> > > > > > > > > > flipped from out-of-ARC to in-ARC, and the auditor is
> still
> > > > > bugging
> > > > > > > him
> > > > > > > > > > about out-of-ARC, the preclear will crash and dump the
> auditor
> > > > > upside
> > > > > > > > > > down in a trash can outside.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Try it sometime.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Running solo the meter will tell you if you are in sync or
> > > not, if
> > > > > > > > > > its reading with each call then sync is in, if the needle
> goes
> > > > > dead
> > > > > > > then
> > > > > > > > > > sync is out. Simply call the same command twice or a few
> times
> > > > > until
> > > > > > > > > > the sync is back in with that command and continue on with
> > > > > > > alternations
> > > > > > > > > > as you feel right.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Pretty soon you will KNOW when sync is in or out and you
> will
> > > no
> > > > > > > > > > longer tolerate out of sync auditing.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Since most dual auditing is random sync auditing, the
> preclear
> > > has
> > > > > > > > > > to follow the auditor's commands willy nilly, auditing
> takes
> > > place
> > > > > > > > > > randomly during the accidental in sync moments.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This leads many to want to solo, and these processes are
> > > > > emminently
> > > > > > > > > > soloable.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If you are a skilled solo auditor and know your e-meter
> > > intimately
> > > > > > > > > > to where it is an extension of your own consciousness, you
> > > will be
> > > > > > > able
> > > > > > > > > > to establish sync quickly, keep it in, and return it in,
> if it
> > > > > goes
> > > > > > > out,
> > > > > > > > > > through muliple calls of the command that FAILED to run.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > That's counter intuitive so watch it.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The command fails because it is out of sync, but the
> > > preclear's
> > > > > > > > > > case is NOT waiting for the auditor to give the other
> command
> > > > > instead,
> > > > > > > > > > because even in the failure, the preclear's case has
> shifted
> > > sides
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > the auditor needs to give the same command AGAIN which
> will
> > > now be
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > sync.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Say the preclear is running worse and better, call them A
> and
> > > B.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If the preclear is in state A, the auditor needs to call
> A, it
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > run and the preclear will shift to B.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Say the preclear fails to shift to B, but the auditor
> thinks
> > > he
> > > > > > > > > > has, so the auditor properly calls B. The preclear is
> still in
> > > > > state
> > > > > > > A,
> > > > > > > > > > so the call of B is now out of sync.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > But by calling B wrongly, the preclear will now shift to
> state
> > > B
> > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > > the auditor HAD BETTER NOT go back and try to fix his
> error by
> > > > > calling
> > > > > > > > > > A! He needs to call B again!.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Sometimes the masses in ridges are so tight neither side
> will
> > > > > > > > > > read for a while. Worse one finds them shifting so fast
> back
> > > > > > > > > > and forth one has to call the sides, worse, better, worse,
> > > better,
> > > > > > > > > > at 2 or 3 a second!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Sometimes NO and SOME need to be run on the items to
> loosen
> > > > > > > > > > them up.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > NO WORSE SOME WORSE
> > > > > > > > > > NO BETTER SOME BETTER
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Since NO is lower tone than SOME, one runs NO first.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Since WORSE is lower tone than BETTER, one runs WORSE
> first.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Remember the CDEINRS scale:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > CURIOUS SOME
> > > > > > > > > > DESIRE |
> > > > > > > > > > ENFORCE |
> > > > > > > > > > INHIBIT |
> > > > > > > > > > NO NO
> > > > > > > > > > REFUSED |
> > > > > > > > > > SUB REFUSED |
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Also remember that when using NO and SOME, NO is meant to
> be
> > > from
> > > > > NO
> > > > > > > down
> > > > > > > > > to SUB REFUSED
> > > > > > > > > > and SOME is meant to be from ENFORCED up to CURIOUS.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So NO and SOME are just a fast way to run the CDEINR scale
> > > without
> > > > > > > > > > having to call specific levels of it.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Sometimes the items are so low tone one needs to run the
> lower
> > > > > part
> > > > > > > > > > of the CDEINR scale directly lowest tone first:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > SUB REFUSED WORSE REFUSED WORSE
> > > > > > > > > > SUB REFUSED BETTER REFUSED BETTER
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > REFUSED WORSE NO WORSE
> > > > > > > > > > REFUSED BETTER NO BETTER
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Sometimes the items are relatively high tone and happy.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > NO WORSE INHIBIT WORSE
> > > > > > > > > > NO BETTER INHIBIT BETTER
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > INHIBIT WORSE ENFORCE WORSE
> > > > > > > > > > INHIBIT BETTER ENFORCE BETTER
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ENFORCE WORSE DESIRE WORSE
> > > > > > > > > > ENFORCE BETTER DESIRE BETTER
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > DESIRE WORSE CURIOUS ABOUT WORSE
> > > > > > > > > > DESIRE BETTER CURIOUS ABOUT BETTER
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Here are some points about running dicoms.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > One or two calls on a dicom is probably not enough.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If you stub your toe or get bit by a mosquitoe for
> example,
> > > you
> > > > > > > > > > might say
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "God do I hate that!"
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Well duh, we know that. Now you gotta say
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "God do I love that!"
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Doesn't matter if you mean it or not, just SAYING it
> changes
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > course of the universe which fits itself to what you
> conceive
> > > even
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > > > > microscopically for the moment.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > But then do it again.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "God I hate that!"
> > > > > > > > > > "God I love that!"
> > > > > > > > > > "I hate that!"
> > > > > > > > > > "I love that!"
> > > > > > > > > > "I hate that!"
> > > > > > > > > > "I love that!"
> > > > > > > > > > "Hate, Love, Hate, Love..."
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Do it until flat on the momentary incident, until you feel
> > > > > > > > > > in it.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For a wider run on all 8 dynamics try running WORSE and
> > > BETTER.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "Get the idea of being worse."
> > > > > > > > > > "Get the idea of being better."
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The 8 dynamics are self, family, groups, mankind, life,
> > > physical
> > > > > > > > > > universe, spirits and the infinite.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Each one is a thrust to survive, enhance, create upon,
> > > whatever,
> > > > > > > > > > and each has its incoming oppressions, suppressions, and
> > > > > oppositions
> > > > > > > > > > from all o'clocks during the day.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Say the landlord calls and wants to raise your rent.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You crash, but then immediately handle the incoming with:"
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "If I were worse (what would be ...)"
> > > > > > > > > > "If I were better (what would be ...)"
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Run until flat or laughter because your size and
> conception of
> > > > > > > > > > yourself just went up an octave.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Another one is for FEAR AND CONFIDENCE.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Say the Devil shows up one day at your door,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "I am afraid ..."
> > > > > > > > > > "I am confident ..."
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Or just simply
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "I am afraid!"
> > > > > > > > > > "I am confident!"
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > When it's hard to impossible to even SAY one side of the
> dicom
> > > > > > > > > > during the fray, the process is biting. It becomes easier
> when
> > > you
> > > > > go
> > > > > > > > > > back and do the pair again and again.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You come up to DARING.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > That's why you can't just run the pair once, otherwise it
> > > becomes
> > > > > > > > > > The Rabbit Process rather than The Dicom Process.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The preclear will rabbit away from it and stop auditing.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > MAKE IT WORSE
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > A long long time ago when I was young and stupid and
> thought
> > > > > > > > > > Scientology standard tech was God's gift to human kind, we
> had
> > > a
> > > > > > > process
> > > > > > > > > > called make it worse.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Preclear would complain about something, and auditor would
> say
> > > > > > > > > > "Make it worse!"
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > That followed directly from the idea that if the preclear
> said
> > > he
> > > > > > > > > > had too much of something he really had too little and
> visa
> > > versa.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You make MORE of things or MAKE THEM AGAIN in order to
> as-is
> > > and
> > > > > > > > > > vanish them!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For example in Standard Operating Procedure 1.x ca 1950's,
> > > Hubbard
> > > > > > > > > > clearly states that the way to handle a Step 5 whose case
> was
> > > > > mostly a
> > > > > > > > > > Black 5, was to run remedy of havingness on blackness
> until he
> > > HAD
> > > > > > > > > > enough blackness at his own command to let go of some of
> it.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Remedy of havingness was simply to mockup the desired
> item, in
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > case blackness, until one didn't need it any more.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It's a one sentence lolapalooza basically dismissing an
> entire
> > > > > tech
> > > > > > > > > > for handling the vast majority of preclears that are still
> > > high
> > > > > enough
> > > > > > > > > > to want to make case gain, but who can't handle the Black
> 5.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So preclear complains and auditor says make it worse, and
> > > preclear
> > > > > > > > > > complains more and auditor says make it worse, and the
> session
> > > > > goes to
> > > > > > > > > > hell and never starts up again.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So why is this?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Well for one, where the preclear is at, and its a REALLY
> > > REALLY
> > > > > bad
> > > > > > > > > > place to be, he is stuck in an AND on worse and better (or
> > > more
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > less).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > There is no way in hell he is going to be able to make
> things
> > > > > worse
> > > > > > > > > > or better until he runs mkaing things WORSE AND BETTER AT
> THE
> > > SAME
> > > > > > > TIME
> > > > > > > > > > FOREVER FOR FREE.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Period.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If the auditor had said 'Make it worse and better at the
> same
> > > time
> > > > > > > > > > forever for free' the preclear might have said 'Huh?' but
> by
> > > then
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > would be too late and the AND would be coming apart.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > THEN the auditor could run
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "Make it worse." or "Make more of it."
> > > > > > > > > > "Make it better." of "Make less of it."
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Until the preclear was in control over the item again.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Notice if the preclear is complaining about too much of
> > > > > > > > > > something, worse means more of it and better means less of
> it.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > But if the preclear is complaining about too little of
> > > something,
> > > > > > > > > > worse means less of it, and better means more of it.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In reality running MAKE IT WORSE/BETTER is hard on the
> > > preclear
> > > > > > > > > > because he will probably say "I can't" which gives him a
> loss
> > > on
> > > > > > > > > > each command. That's very bad auditing.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So the idea is to use the easiest commands a preclear can
> do
> > > > > > > > > > with every single command and take a win on each command.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Taking a win on a command doesn't mean he makes
> perceptible
> > > > > > > > > > case gain on each command, only that he was able to
> execute
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > command successfully.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Preclear who can't make things, can certainly get the idea
> of
> > > > > > > > > > those same things, so get the idea of is most winning
> auditing
> > > > > > > > > > command set around.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So we run instead of make it worse/better:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "Get the idea of it being worse"
> > > > > > > > > > "Get the idea of it being better"
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This is much more powerful as it runs the preclear as
> cause in
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > mere act of conceiving, and he can get the idea even if he
> > > can't
> > > > > > > > > > actually make it worse or better which gives the preclear
> a
> > > win on
> > > > > > > every
> > > > > > > > > > command rather than a loss.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The preclear HAS to make it worse to get an as-isness on
> it
> > > and
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > fact that he made or pulled it in, in the first place.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > But then he HAS to run make it better to see where he
> created
> > > it
> > > > > > > > > > FROM, which is so high up the tone scale he will be seeing
> > > things
> > > > > he
> > > > > > > > > > shouldn't be seeing.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Once he swings down into worse, it will almost
> automatically
> > > > > > > > > > catapult him up to being better wherefrom the worse was
> made.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So getting that swing going from worse to better, to worse
> to
> > > > > > > > > > better, makes this auditing easy as the swing self propels
> > > higher
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > higher, even if it's scary as hell and heaven all wrapped
> up
> > > into
> > > > > one.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The only way up to better is down through worse, and the
> only
> > > way
> > > > > > > > > > down to worse is up through even better.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Once the process is flat on the right item, the preclear
> will
> > > be
> > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > > high he may smile at you for a long time, but he won't be
> > > talking
> > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > it much because the only way to get up there and to stay
> up
> > > there
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > reality is to run the damn process until its flat.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > A good auditor can send a preclear so high the preclear
> just
> > > > > simply
> > > > > > > > > > can't convey the cognitions to the auditor.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Talk about, know about, ain't KNOWING.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > That's kind of where the "don't feed the preclear
> cognitions"
> > > > > comes
> > > > > > > > > > from.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In the first place where the preclear is going to be at,
> > > > > cognitions
> > > > > > > > > > just can not be put into words. And if he did manage to
> get a
> > > few
> > > > > > > > > > across to a lower level auditor or preclear, they would be
> in
> > > deep
> > > > > > > > > > trouble from the raw power, size and beauty of the state
> > > unless
> > > > > > > someone
> > > > > > > > > > were to run the dicom process on them real fast.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > And if someone is there, why not just run the process on
> him
> > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > first place rather than feed him ineffable cognitions to
> no
> > > avail.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You could even run the dicom process on power, size and
> beauty
> > > and
> > > > > > > > > > their opposites.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > But just running worse and better, love and hate, fear and
> > > > > > > > > > confidence, will stop most anything in its tracks: the
> > > reactions
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > things stop for the moment, reactions that provide more
> > > problem to
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > than the problem itself does, and thus leave you
> permanently
> > > > > better
> > > > > > > off
> > > > > > > > > > by just that little amount.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This kind of day to day auditing is mountain climbing
> stuff,
> > > one
> > > > > > > > > > piton after another, up through the clouds of night and
> > > terror, to
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > clear and sunny day on Mount Olympus as a fully operating
> > > being.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Homer
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix -
> > > Lightlink
> > > > > > > > > > (607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca
> NY
> > > > > > > > > > homer at lightlink.com Is that too much to ask?
> > > > > http://www.lightlink.com
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ======================= http://www.clearing.org
> > > > > > > ========================
> > > > > > > > > > Posted: Mon May 23 23:17:57 EDT 2016
> > > > > > > > > > ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/ador1010.memo
> > > > > > > > > > Send mail to archive.com saying help
> > > > > > > > > > ================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof
> > > > > > > ===================
> > > > > > > > > > Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning
> without
> > > > > > > Certainty.
> > > > > > > > > > Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an
> > > Effect.
> > > > > > > > > > Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without
> > > Certainty.
> > > > > > > > > > Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
> > > > > > > > > > Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > > > > > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > iD8DBQFXQ8flURT1lqxE3HERAgI9AJ4t8iKTVhvGavD50v8EWta8PJITLwCgs/TQ
> > > > > > > > > > fq1spGn1uToqYdSUGNpWhF0=
> > > > > > > > > > =R+y7
> > > > > > > > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > HomerWSmith-L mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > HomerWSmith-L at mailman.lightlink.com
> > > > > > > > > >
> http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> 
>


More information about the Clear-L mailing list