Clearing Archive Roboposter roboposter at lightlink.com
Thu Mar 16 12:06:02 EDT 2017

>From International Viewpoints (IVy) Issue 4 - December 1991
Book News

Financial Succes
Reviewed by Leonard Dunn, England

Wallace D. Wattles. "Financial Success through Creative Mind Power" 
(Originally titled "The Science of Getting Rich"). Westwood 
Publishing, Glendale CA, USA

I feel that if one wants to get rich and if one -carries out all that 
the author tells one to do-, then, as he claims one will become rich. 
Like some of the drugs that are used these days to relieve some 
physical disorders I feel that this could produce unfortunate side 
effects such as being more heavily trapped in MEST than one is 
already. His idea of richness is entirely in terms of money and what 
it can buy.

His primary idea is that one should become rich first and then, if one 
wants to, occupy oneself with philosophical matters. One who has no 
desire for great wealth is, according to him, abnormal. By his 
standards I am abnormal since I find my richness of life in quite 
different areas.

He offers some very sound principles that are very workable but from 
my point of view they are directed towards the wrong target. He has 
the conception of a God who is only too pleased to give one everything 
material that one wants. I seem to have heard that this god is named 
Mammon and doesn't have a very high reputation.

On the other hand he does emphasise that one gains wealth without 
its being at the expense of someone else. As with his predecessor 
Ralph Waldo Trine he does say that one should not ask for oneself that 
which one would not ask equally for all others. One very important 
thing which he emphasises but, to the best of my recollection Trine 
does not, is that one must never try to influence another by one's use 
of positive thought, not even for their own good. He could have been 
quoting from my first article on Thought.

He orders "Do not dabble in Theosophy, Spiritualism or kindred 
studies." I agree that one should not dabble one should study them 
seriously since they are the path to Ancient Wisdom.

He quotes Jesus several times but NOT "Seek ye first the kingdom of 
Heaven and its righteousness and all these (material) things shall be 
added unto you." Nor "It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye 
of the needle (the small pedestrian gate beside the main gate in many 
Eastern towns) than it is for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of 
Heaven". I wonder why!

I cannot help comparing this work with "In Tune with the Infinite" by 
Trine, since Trine emphasises the use of thought for spiritual 
advancement and good health with material things following on as a 
matter of course.

Wattles' attitude contrasts strongly with that of LRH who says, in the 
PDC lectures, that if one says to hell with money then it just flows 
in of its own accord. I have had personal experience of this 

This author favours a constant concentration upon MEST objects that 
one desires. I personally find that if I do happen to need something 
MEST, as when I moved house, all I had to do was to make a single 
simple postulate. I much prefer the attitude of Lao Tsu in the Tao te 
Ching that if one follows the Way then things will go right for one.

All told, I found this book a very mixed bag with far too much 
concentration upon the material for my taste but I am sure that it 
will work for those who have a different outlook from my own.

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Mar 16 12:06:02 EDT 2017 
Send mail to archive at lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but 
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

More information about the Clear-L mailing list