Clearing Archive Roboposter
roboposter at lightlink.com
Sat Dec 22 18:06:02 EST 2018
Tape: 5611C02 "Wind up on Stable Datum and Rest Points"
A stable datum and an area of confusion is important business.
A person, a being, is a living being occupying an unstable particle in the
midst of an intolerable motion. The unstable particle he is occupying is
unstable or he wouldn't consider it difficult to occupy the motion area. He
obviously is not occupying those points or particles or positions that are
related to all other particles and positions. He must be occupying
something that is disrelated, hence it is an engram. He is occupying
something that is not related to these other things, he is just standing
back and watching the confusion, otherwise he would have related this thing
to all the other things and it would have ceased to be a confusion and he
couldn't have cared less. He simply would have walked off. He would have
moved up the track.
But there is a contradiction going on, he is sitting there on a rest point
and the engram is waving its hands in from of his face.
That inverts and he gets driven off this point, and then he is in the
motion of watching a motion. That is pretty rough. But not as rough as this
one: He is in the motion looking at a stable datum. He doesn't have the
stable datum! He can't have a motionless thing or body. He must stand there
and look at a motionless thing or body of which he can have no part. He is
not even in good communication with it.
The person could occupy a motionless particle that is not in any way
related to or surrounded by any particle, but he doesn't know whether the
particle is in motion or not.
So you get the next condition, the person simply looking at a confusion. Or
else your next condition, he is occupying one point of the confusion,
considering it motionless, and is therefore looking at all other particles
as being in motion. Or he has been shoved off this point and is looking in
a confused way at confusion. Or he is in the confusion and knows it is a
confusion because he can look at it but not ocupy or be, or assume or
assemble this stable datum.
Let's say he was living in a family that had a person, quite a reproving
person, that wouldn't permit anybody to be him. Who was the most stable
thing in the family? This person is so obviously stable, so obviously
still, so obviously fixed and set. This person actually attains this by
telling other people they are in motion all the time.
So you sort of get an engrammic situation here. "Why don't you be calm like
I am?" "Why don't you take this whole thing calmly?" All of which infers
that the other person is not. And eventually, the other person will wind up
there in the confusion looking at the stillness.
Now you run this process on them. "Look around here and find something in
the room that is still." "Now make you body confront it." This runs out
more motion than you could shake a stick at.
Rest point: An individual in a high games condition is in motion. The game
gets too high, and he drops out. So he goes into a no-games condition. You
can call this a rest point on the track. He was in high motion, didn't like
it after awhile, found a stop point and stopped. For example, a man is
playing the game of "fighting the wars of India." After awhile, he gets
tired of it, and one day, in a battle, when everything is in violent
motion, he considers that this isn't worth it any more and somebody spears
him through the chest. This is a stop point on the case.
There is an exact stop point in the middle of the facsimile where a game
has ended, and the person wants to get into this middle stop point to
escape a high-motion games condition because that stop point was also the
solution to all that danger and motion.
"Look around here and find something in the room that is still."
"Make your body confront it."
Run these two commands alternately (1-2, 1-2, 1-2, and so on) to end point.
Run the process until a realization occurs, or an ability is regained.
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Sat Dec 22 18:06:02 EST 2018
Send mail to archive at lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
More information about the Clear-L