pip3.memo

Clearing Archive Roboposter roboposter at lightlink.com
Wed Dec 26 12:06:01 EST 2018


homer at lightlink.com wrote:  5-30-10

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>    DOES CLEARING WORK
>
>    The question does clearing work can be broken down into
>two sub questions.
>
>    1.) Does truth work, i.e. will the truth set you free?
>
>    2.) Is there a workable approach (clearing) to finding that truth?
>
>    Homer
>
>
5-31-10

This sounds like "one truth" that will set us free.  I believe there is
such a truth.  The Upanishads call this truth "seeing the reality of
what you really are" if I may paraphrase it.  I am aware of no clearing
process that produces this result or even specifically addresses it but
it is addressed  by Zen, Advaita Vedanta, and other sources which are
not considered "clearing".   Keyed out OT is not this result and being
stably exterior with full perception is not this result.  We are
(self-)restrained god-beings.  When completely "cleared" we are
unrestrained.  This does not mean we then know what we are other than
intellectually.  However it may very well be that clearing as we know it
does necessarily lead one to that realization, although it is a gradient
process dealing with smaller relative truths along the way.

There are many definitions of clearing.  In clearing we are discovering
the truths of how we operate in the universe and then use them to effect
results.   For some it is about clearing up engrams or postulates to
become "clear".  For me, the work I call clearing has several
functions.  One is to discover truths, in the sense of relative truths,
like "what happened when" and finding the sources or causes of my (or
another's) conditions and limitations.   But what I discover may or may
not be the truth in any absolute sense or even in a "consensus reality"
sense but perhaps only in a self-validating sense.  These truths may not
be proveable to anyone else.  The main function of course is to actually
clear up unwanted conditions and remove limitations.   So a  guy comes
in suffering from jaw pain.  I work with him and call it "clearing".
The jaw pain goes away and ten years later it has never returned.
Clearing works.  Did he find a truth that healed him?  Maybe.  All I
really know is that I tried to get him to look at some things  and I
guess he did.  I accept his report that it worked.  Will the same jaw
pain ever come back?  I have no idea.  But if my thoughts on what
occurred are accurate, then that condition is permanently resolved.
The answer as to whether clearing works isn't philospohical.  People
KNOW that clearing works - sometimes a little and sometimes a lot -
because they experienced it.   And some of us  are trying to make it
work better and faster ond open up more doors of possibility.  This is
clearing as a transformative, healing, and self discovery process.   No
doubt we are finding truth, seeing what is, and it is freeing, yet these
truths are personal, variable, and changeable.

So there are relative truths and absolute truth.  Clearing tech may
speculate and use models of absolute truth but this has little to do
with everyday clearing.  In everyday clearing we are handling the
relative creations of the processee to release them from their
self-entanglements.   It works and is often miraculous.  Ultimately, if
there is a basic-basic,  it is the fundamental delusion of NOT knowing
what we really are.  There are many strong indications that knowing the
one truth of what we are collapses the whole individual bank or at least
renders it moot.   This is the one truth that will set you free ... with
no gradient.

By the way, would a completely unrestrained full power god-being be
permitted into the consensual gameplay on this planet?  No ... except,
and only, to teach, according to history.   So don't think you could
have your way with the world once your Kryptonian training is
completed.   There are other playgrounds for the overqualified, or
create your own.   Public miracles aren't well tolerated by the
EarthGame rules enforcement committee.   It's the Prime Directive.

Pip

PS: I don't remember why I didn't post this earlier.   I'm usually
digusted with most of what I write until I read it later.  I guess I
could look into that.......nah.


_______________________________________________
Clear-L mailing list
Clear-L at mailman.lightlink.com
http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/clear-l
Thu Sep  9 12:47:17 EDT 2010

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Wed Dec 26 12:06:01 EST 2018 
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/pip/pip3.memo
Send mail to archive at lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but 
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.



More information about the Clear-L mailing list