Clearing Archive Roboposter roboposter at
Tue Aug 25 00:06:02 EDT 2020

                          Acceptance Services Center, ntc.

                      P.O. Box 390696  Mountain View  CA  94039
                        Fax: 415/964-2090  Tel: 415/ 964-3436

                                   Speaker Allen
                                  speaker at

                           THE HEALTH ASPECT OF INTEGRITY
                            (11/10/93; Revised 10/21/96)
                          Non-commercial copying permitted.

       A live body builds itself.  It uses a "blueprint", which is a kind
       of body-consciousness level mental image.  The body, cellular and
       holistic, perceives this image as its points of definition.  It
       automatically and with great care spends all of its subliminal
       activity on duplicating that image in the physical world.

       The body is an auto-replicating machine of great complexity.  It is
       an amazing thing, but it is real and it works.  In fact, it may
       work far better that we have ever imagined.


       It is rumored that every cell in the human body is recycled in less
       than eight years.  This claim states that the very molecules are
       exchanged for replacements.  This may be going a bit far, as in the
       case of tooth enamel, but it is conceivable even for bones.  It is
       possible that every organ that is continually bathed in the body's
       nutrient flow actually does get fully recycled over time.

       This brings up an interesting question.  If the body is constantly
       replacing itself, then isn't that regeneration on a microscale? 
       And if that is true, then shouldn't the body possess an almost
       unlimited capacity for good health and survival?  Might the body be
       potentially immortal?

       Certainly there would be barriers.  Accidents that tear off a part,
       or kill the body outright.

       But why can't the body grow back a part?  The blueprint is still
       there, visible in Kirlian photographs.  And shouldn't the question
       of death from injury be simply a matter of contest between the
       extent of the damage and the time it takes to repair it?

       This opens wondrous speculations on the subjects of regeneration
       and longevity.  But does it have any immediate value?

       It does.  It postulates a reasonable basis for physical
       immortality.  But more, it sets the framework for developing ways
       to assist the body in its quest for immortality.


       The body needs certain material resources to perform its generative
       wonders.  If any of them are missing from the diet, then the
       physical structure cannot conform to the blueprint at the molecular
       level.  And there is speculation that once a chemical process has
       mutated, it may never normalize.

       Of course, that doesn't take the existence of the blueprint into
       account.  Given the blueprint and the body's primal devotion to
       emulating it, it would seem that even the ravages of prolonged
       malnutrition could be overcome, given enough time and assets.

       From this it can be said that it's never too late to clean up your

                                 IN A PERFECT WORLD

       It should be so simple.  But there are other interferences.  They
       are external to the equation, but they are even more powerful than
       the complications of injury and malnutrition.  This is because they
       are AEthereal rather than merely physical.

                            THE LATENT EFFECTS OF INJURY

       When the body suffers an injury, something potentially disastrous
       happens.  It is actually more damaging than the actual injury.

       A "holographic" mental image of the damaged organs is formed.  To
       the degree that the injury is resisted, the image of the injury is
       endowed with the intensity of that resistance.  This often means
       that the image is "invisiblized", because there is enough
       resistance diffused into it that the image is never consciously
       looked at again.

       But it is there, held in place as a standing wave by the opposing
       forces of (a) the need to remember it as valuable experience, and
       (b) the resistance through which the conscious entity strives to
       push it away.  It is held in place constantly, but resisted in
       varying degrees.  When it is not "in mind", there is almost no
       effort directed against it.  But even the slightest contextual
       connection directs attention to it, it comes immediately into mind,
       and it is instantly resisted.

       This is the mechanism if what has been called chronic
       restimulation.  Most images are not in active restimulation at any
       given moment, but many are.  Some transiently, as when the
       contextual reminder is present for only a short time, or only
       occasionally.  Others chronically, as when the contextual reminder
       is nearly always present.

       By the way, I don't use the word restimulation.  I think it implies
       that a non-person thing is being activated by an external power. 
       We use "revivify" and "revivification" instead.  Revivify means to
       put life back into, to re-animate.  Its use here is to put the
       causal focus on the individual.  The image belongs to the
       individual, who revivifies (as in revives) it by endowing it with
       life by way of putting attention on it.

                              TRANSIENT REVIVIFICATION

       Transient revivification seems to occur randomly and without a
       recurring pattern.  An example would be a person on a trip to the
       Mexican pyramids becoming irrationally afraid while climbing to the
       top of one of the pyramids.

       In this example, an old image of disaster, somehow similar to at
       least one factor in the current circumstances, is revivified
       because that similarity directs the individual's attention into the
       old image, which is immediately resisted.  The image is revivified
       by the investment of attention.  Its content includes fear, and the
       fear is felt by the image's owner.  It seems to be an irrational
       fear because there is no clear and present danger in the real-time
       situation and the individual does not recognize the old image as
       the source.  But in the mind, time is just a label.  Beyond that,
       all images are valid realities as far as the imagination is

       This revivification is transient because under usual circumstances
       the person never climbs pyramids.  In fact, we may find (he may
       realize in session) that he has always avoided climbing anything.

       Yes, that is an apparent contradiction.  Isn't it the resistance to
       the image that has been driving him to avoid climbing all along? 
       And isn't that a bit more than transient.?

       Obviously, transient and chronic are relative terms.  True, the
       image we've been discussing is revivified every time the mere
       concept of climbing comes by.  But the exodus from such thoughts is
       so quick that the person never registers more than a twitch of
       discomfort, and that, too, is denied.  So the fear is never
       consciously encountered.  Yes, the image has made a major
       contribution to the individual's limitations.  But as long as he
       stays down off things and structures his life to exclude
       revivification triggers, there will be no noticeable discomfort.

       All that could change, of course.  If his employer moves the
       business high into a tall building with lots of windows and open
       stairs in an atrium connecting the various floors, the
       revivification could become chronic.  The individual would probably
       never make the connection, however.  He would just be uncomfortable
       near the stairs.  He might claim a fear of heights, but have no
       idea where it comes from.  He would probably strive to use the
       elevators whenever possible, and stay away from the windows.

       So we can think of transient revivification as being constant at a
       low level (passive) with spikes or relatively short periods of
       intensification (active).

                               CHRONIC REVIVIFICATION

       When the attention trigger is always or nearly always present, or
       recurringly present, the revivification is chronic.  It can be
       either ongoing or recurring in a short repetitive cycle.

       This is bad enough when the trigger is environmental.  But what if
       the trigger is contained within the body itself?

       For example, a carpenter gets her hand caught in a press, and is
       badly injured.  This is definitely not an event one willingly
       experiences.  So there is a lot of resistance to it, and the image
       of the moment of injury is vested with a lot of intensity.

       Older schools of thought hold that the press, and maybe the job
       site are the revivification triggers for this image.  But if that
       is true, then why does the carpenter's hand never recover, even
       though she never goes back to work?  Why doesn't the body just wash
       away everything in the hand's space that is not blueprint, and fill
       in what is?  By our earlier speculation, that should be exactly
       what happens, if revivification is not occurring.

       But revivification is occurring.  All the time, without relief. 
       Why?  Because the physical body itself, by way of the hands in
       particular, is the revivification trigger!

       It is important to understand how revivification happens.

       The mind is catalogued on the basis of context sensitivity.  This
       means that any two things that are at all similar, or even
       significantly different, share a meaningful context.  They somehow
       fit into the same subject.  So looking at one can lead directly to
       the other.

       Put several of these connections in sequence and you have what is
       commonly called stream of consciousness.  We can call it an
       attention bridge, because that how it works.  Looking at Item A
       sends your attention to Item B, which connects it to Item C, which
       in turn directs it to Item D.  Your attention has bridged the
       apparent gap between unrelated mental objects by following a
       sequence of seemingly random connections.

       Sometimes you can retrace an attention bridge, as in a
       conversation.  "How did we get from farms in the Central Valley to
       New Year's Eve?"  Well, Joe said something about a farm worker that
       reminded Judy of her brother, and she told us a story about him. 
       That reminded me of a similar story concerning my uncle.  Hearing
       that, you thought of your wife's uncle who did some pretty silly
       stuff once when he was drunk, and that got everyone to swapping
       drunk stories, which lead right into New Year's Eve stories.

       A very productive three and a half minutes, wouldn't you say?

       An attention bridge may be impossible to trace under certain
       conditions.  For example, when the steps on the bridge, the mental
       objects, are invisible because they contain resistance.  This is a
       single-individual phenomenon, not quite like the above example,
       although that type of attention bridge can be self-contained as

       The difference with the second type of attention bridge is that its
       elements are "invisiblized" by the individual's unwillingness to
       give them recognition.  But that does not vanquish them, and they
       continue to function as objects of attention transference in the
       attention bridge.  It happens unnoticed.  And because the most
       intense image in a set of images is always the first (and often the
       only) one that gets any attention [Because it is already getting so
       much "unconscious" attention], it happens automatically.

       Attention flows automatically and without notice or consent from
       one object of resistance to any and all other contextually-
       connected objects of resistance.  Because none of these is
       willingly inspected, the attention bridge that is composed of
       resistance-containing images will be invisible under usual

       What has this to do with our carpenter?  Every time she looks at,
       hears about, uses or even thinks of a hand, her attention is
       instantly bridged to the injury image.  But she doesn't know it.

       The result is that the injury image is always revivified.  Which
       brings us back around to the body blueprint.


       The blueprint body has two perfect hands.  But now there is a third
       hand, the injury-image hand.

       The body builds to the image it sees.  Under normal circumstances,
       this is just the blueprint body.  The body doe not critique the
       image, it just manifests it.

       If there is another image superimposed over part of the blueprint,
       the blueprint is modified by it, as far as the body is concerned. 
       Several things can happen.

       When the superimposed image is predominant, the body will build to
       it.  When it is not, the body builds to the blueprint.  A
       compromise can occur when both the blueprint and the image are
       visible to the body consciousness (genum), and the result is a
       composite hand.  This hand won't match either picture, it will be
       composed of shifting elements of both.  As suchit is not just
       different, it is also defective.

       The body can get caught up in switching between the image and the
       blueprint, to the effect that a compromise hand appears to result. 
       But this is different.  It takes a lot more work, because of the
       cycling between images.  And because every time the switch occurs,
       the hand-that-was begins to be washed away while the hand-that-is
       is being built.  Back and forth, over and over, never a constant
       hand of either type.  Just a limbo-hand, and a lot of wasted

       What does not happen is the body getting confused.  It doesn't,
       because it doesn't question the validity of the imagery it
       perceives.  [Unless and until it becomes educated in such matters,
       and even then not in the same way a non-physical being does.]

       But the body can become apathetic.  Its purpose is to actualize the
       blueprint into the physical world.  It begins to suffer an ongoing
       failed purpose, and is deeply affected by that.  But it won't give
       up until it is dead.  It's the most stubborn thing around, a real
       die-hard.  Its existence can degenerate from a celebratory
       manifestation of life into a grueling and hellish exercise in
       futility, and still it persists.

       So the body can become exhausted.  It can devote so much effort to
       the hand project, and consume so much of its resources that it
       begins to generate its own nutrient deficiency.

       Combine failed-purpose apathy with nutrient auto-deficiency, and
       you have a prescription for disaster.

       The first thing to suffer will be the reproductive function. 
       Apathy is the major contributor.

       The next to go will be the immune system.  This happens when the
       body, unable to quit but coming to believe that it can't succeed,
       begins to run out of the essential resources needed to perform
       immunity functions.

       All this from a hand injury?  Not likely.  But the hand injury is
       only an example of the mass of garbage imposed on the average
       body's blueprint.

       The continuing manifestation of the ongoing cycling between two
       images is deformation.

                           THE MODIFIED BLUEPRINT:  ATROPHY

       When the injury image is so resisted as to completely bar attention
       from the affected organ, the organ atrophies.  The body stops
       seeing it, and so doesn't visualize flowing nutrients to it or even
       creating it.  Construction stops, and the organ begins to wither.

       This is what a body without spirit is like.  Remove not just the
       non-material being that may be inhabiting the body, but remove the
       genetic consciousness (the genum) as well, and you have a meat-body
       vegetable.  Worse, actually, because this thing won't eat and
       doesn't pursue a procreative cycle, so it is less alive than a
       plant.  Nothing will happen in it beyond simple chemical processes,
       and they will gradually break down.  Without the guiding light of
       consciousness of some type being invested into an image of some
       sort, there is no life.  Even plants have that.

       Of course, the genum doesn't give up like that.  But it can
       withdraw from a portion of the body.  It will have withdrawn from
       what it can't see without even realizing it, because it can't vest
       into what it cannot see.  Even so, as far as our carpenter's hand
       is concerned, the genum cannot see anything there and so is not
       there.  The hand suffers the fate we just described.

                                THE INTEGRITY FACTOR

       Integrity is the state of wholeness and purity, nothing left out
       and nothing added in.

       A body with integrity has an uncontaminated blueprint and is
       successfully actualizing it into the physical world.  Such a body
       is happy, healthy, strong, and potentially immortal.

       But take away just one part, or add just one contaminant, and the
       body's integrity is compromised.  Do this, however subtly, all over
       the thing, and it has no integrity at all.

       Structurally speaking, nothing can stand without integrity. 
       Replace a steel girder in a bridge with a wooden beam, and you have
       compromised the bridge's integrity.  Let a bridge move off its
       pylons in a hurricane, barge collision or earthquake, and it will
       have lost its integrity.

       The difference between compromised and lost integrity is simply a
       matter of duration until failure.  The bridge with the wooden beam
       may continue to stand, but only until the bridge's inherent load
       stress destroys the wood, or the wood deteriorates on its own, or a
       full load comes down the road and surpasses the wood's strength. 
       When any one of these things happens, the situation changes
       instantly from compromised integrity to lost integrity.

       When the bridge loses its integrity, it fails immediately.  And so
       it is with all things.  Compromised integrity permits a temporary
       illusion of continuance as normal.  Lost integrity proceeds
       directly to death.

       Compromised integrity means eventual premature failure, (jeopardy),
       and lost integrity means immediate failure (nullification).

                                   THE SIMPLE FIX

       The obvious solution to the contravention of the blueprint body by
       injury imagery is to clear the injury imagery away.

       Many techniques have been proposed for this purpose, and it is not
       my intention to describe one in detail at this time.

       What I will do now, however, is pose a standard that I believe
       applies to any such technique.  It is found in the Acceptance
       Fundamentals at number 27.  This Fundamental applies to counselling
       at all levels, from simple massage- and touch- access body therapy
       procedures to fully-directed conscious inquiry at the ideational

                 The task of the practitioner is to direct mutual
                 conscious attention onto the Petitioner's
                 objects of unaware attention.

       This can be done many ways, some of them only marginally effective. 
       The most effective method is the use of questions.  The best form
       of questioning is one that directs attention innocently by category
       without implying possible answers.  This has been called
       questioning from innocence.  It implements the concept of
       specifics-ignorance, which is the idea that the Practitioner knows
       none of the Petitioner's specifics until the Petitioner has
       volunteered and verified them.

                              MODIFICATION BY DECISION

       There is a second source of blueprint contravention.

       When an extraneous consciousness of a higher order than the genum
       is present and thinking, the imagery at play in that thinking is
       perceived by the genum.  To the extent that it is both body-
       oriented and intense (made brilliant by vestment with attention),
       it distracts the genum from its blueprint and causes it to build to
       the alternative forms found in the being's imagery.

       This can cause bizarre deformations and mutations.  It can also
       cause beneficial mutations.  This may in fact be the impetus behind
       evolution: The being thinks, "Gee, if I could just wrap my front
       fin around that reed, I could pull it down and eat the flowery

       The being repeatedly tries to do this, lifespan after lifespan,
       regularly projecting the image of a fin that can do this.  The
       genum begins to build to the image of the desired fin, to the
       extent that it is dominantly visible over the existing blueprint
       fin.  The imagined fin becomes more refined as the physical fin
       develops toward the task, and that improves the evolving fin even
       more.  Finally, the fish has rudimentary hands, and it eats the
       flowering tops of reeds.  The evolved fin-as-grasper is greatly
       admired and so remains predominant.  After a while, the original
       blueprint fin is a dim non-memory.  The blueprint has been revised.

       Of course, the injury-incident image, rendered redundant by
       unavoidable environmental factors, can also cause evolution.  And
       evolution may not always lead toward desirable improvements.

       What if the temperature began to rise all over the planet?  What if
       the quality of the solar radiation that passes through the
       atmosphere changes.  We could find ourselves in changed bodies,
       looking around at many other body-species in the throes of
       adaptation.  We might not like what we see.

       We might not like what "we" and our playground have become.

                             MODIFICATION BY SELF-IMAGE

       But wait, we're not finished.  There is yet a third source of
       blueprint contravention.  And this one is the most destructive of
       all because of how it happens.

       When a being develops a self-image, it usually includes physical
       postures and attributes.  Even when the essence of the self-image
       is AEthereal, there will be body-picture content to the degree that
       the being is familiar with expressing itself through bodies.

       The body-imagery in a being's self-images is of particularly
       intense interest to the genum.  The genum holds free-spirit beings
       in very high esteem.  It respects their power, creativity and
       diversity.  So when the being projects a body-image "toward" the
       genum, the genum takes the imagery as instruction.

       This do not happen by design, from either side.  The being is
       simply perceiving itself within a particular persona.  The
       projected image blinds the genum to the blueprint, so it can only
       see the projection.  Of course, not all projections describe
       complete bodies.  A being may have a "cry-baby" self-image that
       includes only parts of the body, such as the face and chest.  The
       remainder of the blueprint will still be visible to the genum, and
       so will be used.

       Why is this type of contravention so much worse?  Because beings
       have a potentially infinite range of expression.  This means that
       they can impose a nearly infinite set of body-images onto the

       The usual situation in life as we know it is that the genum is
       being bombarded by a huge and continually shifting volume of
       imagery.  There is hardly any time spent with any one of these
       images to get anything accomplished in its actualization before the
       next one comes in.  Now everything that is inconsistent with the
       new image begins to be dissolved while the genum shifts gears into
       building to the new image.  The degenerative cycle operates again.

       The being also has the ability to express itself in many ways at
       once.  Thus the genum's bombardment is not in the nature of linear
       change.  The genum is awash in a chaotic swirl of overlaid and
       contradictory structural information.  The disaster is that it
       remains uncritical even under these conditions, and tries to
       actualize a body based on what it perceives.

       The result?  No clear blueprint bodies.  The sad fact is, it is
       probable that no one has ever seen a truly healthy body on this
       planet.  Maybe anywhere!


       Instead we get composite bodies.  But these are not composites of
       separate external beingnesses, as has been assumed in the past. 
       They are usually built by a single genum but patterned after a
       multiplicity of blueprint-contravening and self-contradictory input
       from the being.

                               SUICIDE BY INVALIDATION

       Taking an adversarial position toward the material world is a
       reliable path to illness and death.  The reason is simple: the body
       is a material world construct, and rejecting physical existence
       involves rejecting the body.  But it doesn't happen so simply.  If
       it did, it wouldn't happen unless one made a conscious decision for
       it to happen, and then it would happen immediately.

       It usually happens in a very sneaky way.  First, the being gets the
       idea that it is separate from the physical world.  Then, believing
       itself to be superior to it, the being begins to make an effort to
       control the physical world.  This brings about an adversarial
       situation in which the being commits several self-destructive acts,
       so far as its continued life on-planet is concerned.

       The being sees itself capable of losing the battle, of being
       controlled by the material, and begins to believe that it is
       actually so controlled, or caught up, trapped, held down, or
       whatever.  It then extends and pursues an intention to get free of
       the entanglements of the physical world.

       The problem doesn't stem directly from the rejection of the
       physical world.  In theory, that would just make the world more
       solid to the being.  The result would simply be that the being
       would see itself as more solidly ensnared.  But that's only part of
       what happens.

       The problem is at the beginning, with the definitional distinction
       that was made between the being and the physical universe.  The
       problem is that the being sees itself as different than what it
       really is.  This causes an extremely intense interplay of
       conflicting self-imagery, between whatever the being really is
       (something) and what it is claiming to be (not-thing).

       This is amplified by the being's quietly adamant assertion that it
       is not the body.  What makes this assertion destructive to the body
       is that the body never gets recognized as valid.  More, the
       decisional and definitional assertion is perceived and internalized
       by the genum as its own idea, given from on high.

       The genum unquestioningly builds to the brightest construct,
       whether it's an image or a thought. [The genum can't know a
       difference between these.]  And the brightest construct has now
       come to be a composite of the being's desperately sought-after
       wanna-be fantasy, the hidden true identity of the being, and the
       assertion, "I am not a body!"

       Given this input, the genum slavishly kills off its body-self
       trying to build a body based on lies, resistance and denial.  This
       is usually a prolonged an disgusting process, as with cancer.

                                 INTEGRITY REVISITED

       These, then, are the health aspects of integrity.

       The body's integrity is compromised and eventually destroyed by the
       imposition of imagery and decisions which contravene its blueprint. 
       Every overlaid image, and every interjected belief that can be
       interpreted, in whatever convoluted manner possible, is an add-on
       to the blueprint.  And every element of the blueprint that is
       obscured by one of these is a missing piece.

       As for the being who is caught up in this mess, the game is bleak
       and recursive. (It revivifies itself and recycles ad nauseam.) 
       Life on Earth will meet all the most intensely-held expectations
       (always the worst, if you think about the resistance factor).  And
       desperation sets in as the deteriorating body becomes more and more
       of an impediment to the fulfillment of purposes.


       Integrity is being self.  The body builds to a blueprint.  In a
       perfect world, the blueprint is clean and the genum is clear, and
       the body is perfect and self-regenerating.  But the blueprint is
       usually modified by injury-imagery, decisional redefinition and the
       self-imagery of whatever non-physical being(s) may be attached to
       or operating through the body.

       Conflicting self-imagery imposes multiple and incompatible
       modification-sets.  The body is always building to the current
       modified blueprint and therefore must change specifications every
       time the modification set changes.

       Great amounts of resources are wasted in the reversals, often
       leaving the body short on needed materials.  This causes additional
       structural defects as the body attempts to compensate.  And the
       body will compensate to astounding degrees of grotesqueness in
       order to continue to exist.

       The result is a body literally torn between specifications and
       therefore overextended and possibly even shredded over time.

                                  HOW TO BE HEALTHY

       Diet is a small part of health when you consider that the other
       factors discussed herein can render it irrelevant.  Diet can't save
       you from the other factors, but it does provide a baseline for the
       body's survival.  And as the blueprint contravention lessens, the
       value of a good diet increases proportionately.  As the body
       recovers blueprint integrity it begins to attempt to repair
       structural integrity.  It needs the proper nutrition to do that

       Getting clear on self is essential.  The first step at any level of
       awareness is to call into question every evaluation you've ever
       been given as to who and what you are.

       Inspect the input you get from scientists.  Scrame the veneer off
       your religious indoctrination, even if you think you've moved
       beyond it.  Leave no one's opinion sacred.  Sociologists,
       psychologists, ministers, gurus, parents, and the media could all
       be wrong.  Have you been reading mystical materials that talk about
       spirituality and spiritual powers?  What if they're so far off the
       mark that they're just fantasy and delusion.  Been listening to a
       preacher of evangelist or New-age channel?  What if they're wrong? 
       Been reading magazines with success stories?  And developing a
       private depository of hidden standards?

       The second step toward getting clear on self is to forget about it
       and get involved with pursuing purposes.  Set some intentions and
       follow through.  Get your attention out into the worlds that are
       continually unfolding right before you, if only you were to notice.

       Find a practitioner to help you dismantle unwanted conditions that
       don't just go away on their own as you begin to neglect them, and
       practice staying out of session when you're not in session.

       Learn to hear yourself.  There may be a crowd in your head, but one
       of those voices is your own.  Don't rush it, don't be desperate to
       find it today, and stay open to making mistakes.  And keep your
       practitioner handy for when a not-you voice turns up but doesn't go
       away quietly.

       Finally, the most important suggestion of all.

       Begin to pursue personal integrity with an enthusiasm unparalleled
       in your life so far, and never let up.  Yes, you can only be your
       true self to the best of your understanding of what that is in the
       moment.  But you can work to improve that understanding.  And you
       can shed inconsistent behavior quite easily.  With those behaviors
       will go all the blueprint- contravening self-images that support

       The biggest benefit is that when you get out of your body's way and
       start helping the genum get clear on the blueprint, improved health
       is on the way.

       One final note.  I hear now and then about someone doing hundreds
       and thousands of hours on clearing "hitch-hiker" entities.  I 
       question the wisdom of that approach.  I question it because I've 
       seen too many genums picked apart and client's bodies undermined or 
       even destroyed by a practitioner-client alliance in opposition to 
       physical existence.

       Review my description of composite bodies, above.  I don't see them
       as necessarily the product of composite or cluster entities.  I do see 
       them as most likely the consequence of the individual's own wealth of 
       self-imagery, in play on automatic.

       I'm not saying that external entities don't exist.  I am saying that we 
       should not forget to look to ourselves for the answers. 

       As a Practitioner, that would be the basis of my approach.


          (and Mikie!)

Allen, Speaker for Acceptance        |        Acceptance Services Center
speaker at                     -0-       Box 390696 Mtn Vw CA 94039                   |                    (415) 964-3436
Moderated email list: Accept-L at  Inquiries, faq requests invited.
               Latest ftp/web addition or update: 5/23/95

================ ====================
Tue Aug 25 00:06:02 EDT 2020 
Send mail to archive at saying help
================== ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but 
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

More information about the Clear-L mailing list