homer at lightlink.com
homer at lightlink.com
Tue Jan 1 03:06:03 EST 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
PERSISTING AND VANISHING TRUTH
Adore makes the following definitions.
A Postulate: a posted beingness. (AS-IS)
A Consideration: an added significane usually of a relation
between two or more posted beingness. (ALTER-IS)
Remember color forms as a kid? They had this black board and a
whole mess of bright vinyl color forms that you could put up on the
board and they would stick.
Well the board is the void.
The vinyl color forms are creations, these are postulates, posted
beingnesses, no time, no change, no significance, just IS. You post
them to the board and they IS.
Now on the real board the color forms would stay put once you put
them there, so this analogy breaks down at this point because in the
static void, if you post a color form, it will vanish shortly
thereafter unless you make a consideration about it.
A consideration is an added significance usually but not always
relating two posted beingnesses to each other.
A signficance is who or what created it, when it was created, why
it was created, where it was created, what it is used for, what its
purpose is, what it is, whether it is good or bad etc.
When a thetan first puts up a color form it just IS. It isn't
ANYTHING in particular. He puts up a few of these, and they keep
vanishing as fast as he puts them up. Then he does something
different, he adds significance to a couple of them.
He says "This color form is an ashtray, and that color form is a
cigarette, and the ashtray is USED to hold the ashes that come off the
cigarette and the ashes are CAUSED by the cigarette burning which was
caused by this color form I'm gonna call a match over here."
There is a process in Scn that has to do with simply naming
objects. This is because, although names can be completely arbitrary
and mean nothing, usually they signify the considerations that have
been placed on an object.
You say "This is a car", and wham its use, purpose, history,
future, problems, concerns etc all come up to the mind. These are the
added significances to the pure unadulterated color form that has been
labeled a car.
By running this process for a while, pretty soon the
significances begin to as-is, and the pure color form is left behind,
and pretty soon IT begins to as-is and you get a vanishment of the
image in the pc's space.
Book and Bottle does this to some pc's, you say pick up the
bottle, they say "What bottle?"
Hubbard wrote in the PABs something like the following scale.
Native State KNOW Nothing created
AS-IS Not KNOW Color form posted, vanishing truth
ALTER-IS Know About Signficance added, persisting truth
NOT-IS Not Know About Denial of persisting truth.
ISNESS Wrong Know About Persisting falsehoods
Native state is not 'KNOW' in the sense of consciousness-of, or
in the sense of know about, it is KNOW HOW TO, able to, natively
capable, in the sense that the native quiescing God is fully capable
of exercising all of its abilities at any time although none are being
exercised at that moment. Those abilities ARE the ability to enage in
as-is, alter-is, not-is and is.
The state of as-isness is when the static makes its first color
form, posts its first beingness, experiences its first
consciousness-of color form.
This color form, perceived without added signifance is a
vanishing truth, because it is what IS, and it won't hang around for
long. It's just the way things work. This mechanism is not even
created or considered into existence, it is the basic operating mode
of the static and its first creation.
The as-is state is called NOT KNOW because the static is no
longer in the quiescent potential state of total KNOW. It has begun
to manifest perceivable color forms and thus to limit itself.
((I disagree with this analysis. The NOT KNOW is actually NOT
KNOW ABOUT only born of no added significances rather than force as it
is a bit lower tone. - Homer))
The state of alter-is is when the static has a few as-is color
forms going and starts to add significances to them, what they are,
what they are used for, why he created them. The static begins to
KNOW ABOUT it's color forms. All know about is created, fabricated
just as the color forms are.
These added significances add change, and therefore time, into
the scene, thus we get 'dreamtime'.
To the degree that the static forgets that the added
significances are created arbitrarily and to the degree that the
static chooses to BELIEVE that these significances are actually true,
to that degree do the altered color forms begin to persist on their
own through time.
Persistence is an as-is color form altered with significance that
is considered to be TRUE.
These signifances are called persisting truth. They are a lie in
that they are an alteration of the original as-is color forms, but
they are truth in that they are the original significances added onto
the color forms.
It is important to note that the significances added onto the
color form are arbitrarily chosen, the color form that got called an
ashtray could just have easily gotten called a hockey puck in another
round of creation.
Thus persisting truths are 'true' only in that they are indeed
the first significance added to the object, not that they have any
After the static has created a persisting scene of color forms
and persisting truths added onto them, it can then engage in further
It can either engage in denial of what it knows about, pretending
that it doesn't know, which is not-isness. Or it can invent further
significances to confound the original significances put on the
Where at first he said "This is an ashtray used to hold ashes
made by me", he later says "This is a paper weight made by Joe".
Both not-isness and these second added significances are then
called persisting falsehoods.
So in order to make something really persist the being needs to
do 4 things called the persistence sandwich.
1.) AS-IS, create an as-is color form
2.) ALTER-IS, add a persisting truth to it
3.) NOT-IS, deny the persisting truth
4.) ALTER-IS add another persisting truth which is therefore
a persisting falsehood.
The being at 4.) thinks he is at 2.) and thus gets into a lot of
trouble when he tries to undo it.
To vanish any manifesting condition of existence then, one must
bring the pc back to the original persisting truth of color form plus
added significance, then to separate these as both independent and
arbitrary creations, at which point both will become vanishing truths
and return to non manifestation.
In theory this is true for both physical universe masses and for
mental masses in the preclears mind.
Remember each being has his own version of the PU, there isn't
just ONE that all share, there is a common agreement that makes them
all the same across all beings inside it, but each being has his own
copy. It is a fantastic alter-is just to claim there is only one PU!
It is generally accepted that we don't want to vanish physical
universe masses, violating the laws of conservation of matter and
energy would have dire consequences on the balance of the universe.
Instantaneously removing one marble from the atmosphere of earth would
cause a collapsing atmospheric shock wave that could be felt around
the planet by any seismographic instrument.
But it is desirable to vanish the mental masses that a pc has
accumulated over this life and many lives.
In the physical universe we only want to find better and original
persisting truths so that we can leave the masses standing but not be
so lost about them.
This we call science.
In the pc we certainly do not want to bring the pc only to a
persisting truth where the masses still stand. We want a full
vanishing truth where the masses disappear completely and forever.
This we call auditing.
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer at lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Jan 1 03:06:03 EST 2013
Send mail to archive at lightlink.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the HomerWSmith-L