homer at homer at
Sat Jan 19 03:06:29 EST 2013

Hash: SHA1


> Certainty of the future.
> Is this not known now?  Do you know the OT IX to OT XII ones?
     They are not publically released, and no I don't know them.

     But you know OT VIII is basically

     What determines how you feel?

     If you can get someone to put an 'other determinism' there enough,
he will suddenly find he is determining the other determinism to be
there.  Knowing by looking flip flops to looking by knowing.

     That's the observation/consideration flip flop.

     There are two opposing definitions of To Determine

     To determine by looking moves into To determine by causing.

     That is the purpose of auditing.

     "There is NO   DETERMINING"
     "There is SOME DETERMINING"   Run both definitions
     One runs truth with

     "There is NO   TRUTH."
     "There is SOME TRUTH."

     One runs Character with:

     "There is NO   Author"
     "There is SOME Author"
     "There is NO   Character"
     "There is SOME Character"

     Future is the same way:

     "There is NO   FUTURE."      Run PAST and PRESENT too.
     "There is SOME FUTURE."

     "There is NO   CAUSE"        Run on OTHER CAUSE also.
     "There is SOME CAUSE"

     All the complexity is a waste of time.

     Sometimes you gotta run refused, no, inhibited, enforced, desired,
curious about, known about, and source of.  But most often NO and SOME
work just fine.

     "There is NO   BRAIN"
     "There is SOME BRAIN"

     "There is NO PROOF"
     "There is SOME PROOF"

     The real answer to the prove it cases is to give them a solo
process they can run for a few hours across many days, that will show
that "Scn is good thing and ought to be continued".

     Much better than dropping an atom bomb on their soul.

     The OT's who HAVE power are nervous about it, how is someone
who doesn't have power going to respond to it.

     Fools rush in where Angels dare not tread and God's go crying for
their mama.

- -- 
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith     The Paths of Lovers    Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF        Cross            Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer at    In the Line of Duty
Tue Apr 22 15:00:00 EDT 2008

================ ====================
Sat Jan 19 03:06:23 EST 2013
Send mail to archive at saying help
================== ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but 
not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)


More information about the HomerWSmith-L mailing list