HomerWSmith at HomerWSmith at
Tue Jan 29 21:12:28 EST 2013

Hash: SHA1

     SESSION NOTES 1/29/2013

     OK.  I am rollercoastering wildly.

     Had a really good run with Jane on,

     Get the idea of

     Something you want to not be.
     Something you want to be.

     Something you want to not do.
     Something you want to do.

     Something you want to not have
     Something you want to have.

     Something you want to not know.
     Something you want to know.

      I ran it muzzled, with simple OK's as my response, and tried to
stay away from digging for or speaking about specific things, although
of course some came up.  Took about 30 minutes to dig deep.

      The process really started to bite on DO *AND* NOT DO.

      No specifics but it was clear that EVERYTHING I do is a do AND not
do at the same time.  51.0 percent do, and 49.0 percent not do, and
things get done :)

      I run a lot of 'What is right, What is wrong?', because it is

      This led into OFF PURPOSE again, and OPPOSED/OPPOSING, and it would
seem that there are major oppterms in my NOTS casings which are made of
beings still working to die, enslave, etc.  They don't want to be this
way most of them, but they think their mother will be skinned and dumped
outside as an ant farm if they don't cooperate with the enslavers.

      Simple NOTS (auditing other beings in vicinity) handling alleviates 
the term/oppterm tension until the next layer.  But I will tell you, its 
not the goals in opposition that cause all the problem, its the level of 
wild abandon that the overts reached on each side trying to deal with or 
wipe out the other, and the collateral damage.  Each side has probably 
caused more harm to their own side than the other side during this war.

      That's the sticky tar the being can't see through or dig his way
out of it, because he will never live it down: "Who killed my cat!"

      There is a good possibility he did, while trying to kill the bad 
guy's cat, and when its one's own parents, mate, children or teammates 
that get killed as unintended collateral damage it can be a soul crusher.

      Part of my sorrow on Mira, was that she was an experiment on my part 
of taking care of a semi wild cat, spade but abandoned.  I was doing it 
for me, it gave me something to do, and although she appreciated being fed 
every day after hunting her down with the radio, I was in love with the 
game, so she ended up dead.  Of course I also saved her life at least 
twice including when she first came to us.  But the self blame remains and 
leads right down the channel of sorrow.  Like Hubbard said about squeezing 
the kitten too hard because you adored it so, freaked it out and it died 
in your arms.  You love the kitten but the kitten thinks you are a boa, 
and so buys the farm on credit.

      Also on Black V I ran a lot of

      "Put a NO mockup there, and not know what it is."

      That loosened up things measurably and made it abundantly clear
that blackness is not nothing there but something there.

      I think I mentioned already one of the most powerful unlimited
processes there is was:

      "Get the idea there is nothing there."
      "Get the idea there is something there."
      "Get the idea there is no one there."
      "Get the idea there is some one there."

      The someone/noone grants life, we are auditing elementals after all
that are making the black MEST mockups of the time track.

      The two guys who are mocking up the unwanted scene and the
blackness covering it are WAY more important to audit that the unwanted
scene or the blackness taken as mere recording of MEST happenstance.

      Yes we care what happened, but we are hiring out the chronic
remindering of the incident to a couple of mercenary mockup creators to
keep it in restim.

      This is why humans never solved this problem, they think they are
alone in a dead MEST universe, when in fact their mind and bodies and
every thought are MADE of elemental conscious units BEING those things,
there isn't a dead particle in existence anywhere, and can't be!

      Even the experience of death has to be mocked up by a living unit.

      Also looking at blackness isn't BEING blackness, remember a being
creates by BEING, *THEN* by standing back and looking at it from 'a
distance'.  That scene over there that he can't confront looking at is
really something he daren't BE first.

      So run the cycle, BE -> SEPARATE -> LOOK AT ACROSS A DISTANCE.  The
distance doesn't exist anyhow, its an illusion in consciousness, but the
insertion of that illusion is enough of an alter-is to make the mockup
un as-isable, and unconfrontable.  You can always confront what you can
BE, it is the movement from BE-ER to LOOKER and the resulting (illusory)
separation between LOOKER and LOOKED-AT that causes persisting pain, no
matter what the mockup.

      Then I started to solo a really long and rough run of:

     What is the worst thing about your future?
     What is the best thing about your future?

      Probably should have run past present and future.

      But I figure "The past is used to excuse the future, and the future
is used to make up for the past, via our present time considerations
that we are failing miserably.

      Also the past is WHAT is in restim, but the future is WHY it is in
restim, and the present provides the HOW it is in restim if only we
could see it.

      Anyhow on worse thing about the future, I got a very deep covered
in pain item about not having a father old enough to be dead out of the
gate next life time.  But it went all over the place, was a good run,

      I keep crying about Mira, cold dead crushed body etc, what ever
happened to well and happy human being, I ask you?

      How do you live and care deeply and keep it together in this valley
of the shadow of death?  They say its a shadow, but man, looks real as
cold dead meat to me.

      The difference between between an alive thing and a dead thing is
almost unspannable, and the fall between the high of life and the low of
death is as steep and deep as the abyss of sorrow.

      This 'I got to be a God' stuff to not puke all day long at what is
going on makes it hard :)

      I don't want to be a God (no bias) and I don't want to be a human
(bias).  The minute you care (bias) for anything here, your heart is

      The ANDS are monumental.

      I suppose only an AND could drive a GodSoul crazy and keep
persistence in TimeStone (MEST) going long enough to suffer.


- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY
homer at  Is that too much to ask?

> Hello Homer, another black case here.   My auditor (he seems to be back
> online now) asked me some questions about how I mock things up (or don't),
> and started to look like a compulsive not-is of all "present time" scenes,
> objects, etc..   In basic, must know butted up against must not know.
> Already did CCHs and that helped.   Doing Dennis' repair of importances
> (with some help to stay focused).
> Yes, I used to see dead civil war soldiers in the woods.   Timebreaking
> seems to have keyed that out. 
> Dennis' processes, done as instructed, are not a bandaid, and sometimes the
> patient needs a bandaid too.   Maybe they are a bandaid, just that pc
> cannot stay the fidgets when in solo mode.
> Running Level 4 To Enhance was a bandaid and helped with livingness,
> key-outs, but not much help to enable me to do the Level 2 instructions
> without mental flights.   I feel like a kid with a beautiful new bike and
> cannot ride it.   Training wheels?
> Okay, back to it.   Thank you for the post -- very timely.

======================= ========================
Posted: Tue Jan 29 21:12:27 EST 2013
Send mail to saying help
================== ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but 
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)


More information about the HomerWSmith-L mailing list