ADORE618 (fwd)

HomerWSmith at lightlink.com HomerWSmith at lightlink.com
Sun Aug 2 16:06:38 EDT 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


       GUARDIAN DICOMS

       A dicom is a DIchotomy of Comparable and Opposite Magnitude.

       Dicoms usually come in pairs of 4.

       NO STATIC  - SOME STATIC
       NO KINETIC - SOME KINETIC

       Although we like to think that HATE is the opposite of LOVE, for
our purposes the true opposite of LOVE is NO LOVE.

       NO LOVE is either pretended NO LOVE at not-isness on the tone
scale, or it is actual NO LOVE at as-isness on the tone scale.  The
first will read and run, the second will float.

       However since love and hate seem to be related as opposites we can
form the auditing pair:

       NO LOVE - SOME LOVE
       NO HATE - SOME HATE

       The primary dicom is

       NO - SOME

       This can be normalized for auditing purposes to:

       NO NO   - SOME NO
       NO SOME - SOME SOME

       NO NO means not-ising not-ising, no longer being aware
of not-ising.   At SOME NO, the being would be aware of
not-ising.

       NO SOME means not-ising isness.  SOME SOME means aware
of isness.

       When specific items won't read, one can often find the
next item by running NO and SOME without any item attached.  That
runs the next item in line until it appears or another runnable
item appears instead.

       A basic generic item pair is:

       NO THING - SOME THING

       English plays with this to create a dicom of the form

       NOTHING - SOMETHING

       To normalize it to our auditing standards and to allow it to run
successfully we need to run

       NO NOTHING   - SOME NOTHING
       NO SOMETHING - SOME SOMETHING

       This allows us to run thetans and their creations.

       Remember that a thetan experiences itself as a nothing there, and
its creations as a something there.

       This is a reversal of the truth which is that the thetan is the
only something there is, and its creations are glow in the dark nothings
in the thetan's substrate of self.

       Imagine a phosphorescent rock sitting in the dark, not glowing.

       It's a something there, but is experienced as a nothing there.

       Then we shine a UV lamp on it for a few seconds and remove it.

       Suddenly the rock is glowing red, green, blue and white in the
dark.

       Now it is experienced as something there, but the change from
'nothing there' to 'something there' is no where as substantial as the
original something that was there when the rock was not glowing at all.

       In other words a change from not glowing to glowing is not a
significant change from nothing there to something there.

       While the change from the absence of a thetan to a presence of a
thetan is a significant change from nothing there to something there.

       So even though the thetan experiences itself as 'nothing there', it
is in fact the only something there that can be, except perhaps for the
Source substrate that unifies all thetans into one operating organism.

       The conscious experiences of MEST that thetan considers are
'something there', are no more there than when they are off.

       What's there is still there, namely thetan and Source.

      Source will always be there whether or not it is glowing in the
night of the void with conscious experiences.

      Void that you can see and void that you can not see is still the
same void, no change in stuff.

      A thetan that is sound asleep in the Big Snooze and manifesting
absolutely nothing, is still as much a something there as when he is
awake and spewing conscious experiences all over the place.

      By the way the glowing of the void as conscious experience is not
the result of emmanation of photons.

      The void is self luminous.

      Thus whether it is glowing as something there (color) or nothing
there (darkness), the void is still there.  It may have changed state,
but it hasn't changed whether it is still there.

      The static therefore, although experienced as nothing there, is
actual and very much there, just not in space and time which are
glowings of self luminosity in the substrate of the static.

      SHORT DETOUR INTO THE PROOF

      Space is a viewpoint of dimension.  The viewpoint has no dimension, 
and the dimension it sees has no actual dimension either.  In other words 
you don't need to have a 3 dimensional space to experience 3 dimensions.

      A self luminous mockup of a 3 dimensional rock doesn't, AS A
MOCKUP, take up any actual space or time.

      Mockups are pictures OF space and time and do not themselves take
up any space or time.

      Hyenas can't handle that one, they will demand you prove it.

      They consider it the extraordinary claim, but the claim that
mockups of space and time DO take up actual space and time OR that there
is actual space and time in which to put a mockup, is the more
extraordinary.

      But you know a hyena, 6 billion hyenas can't be wrong!

      Except on Earth.  The incredibility and preposterousness of it all
protects the dreamball theory completely from discovery and acceptance.

      Self luminous (glow in the dark) mockups of 3 dimensional objects
are themselves zero dimensional.

      A 3 dimensional object couldn't ever be self luminous.

      In fact a 3 dimensional object could never be SEEN no matter how
many photons it emmanated, because the see-er and seen would be
separated by a space time distance and thus be two different objects.

      One is always seeing A by looking at something A emmanated when A is 
separated from the see-er.  Thus one never actually sees *A*, only the 
something else.

      Sorry two different objects can never see each other nor know about
each other with certainty.

      Thus if God and Soul are two different objects, they will never
know about each other with certainty.

      No object can ever see another object different from itself.

      True space or time between two objects makes them different from
each other, and therefore blind to each other via direct self luminous
perception.

      Therefore if you can see it, self luminousness means zero 
dimensional.  Conscious mockups which you can't see aren't emmanating 
anything at you, you see them as they are directly, they are zero 
emmission visuals.  Nothing in the alleged physical space time universe 
can do this.

      Thus during the running of NOTHING and SOMETHING, your pc's
conception of what is nothing and what is something will change
dramatically all over the place.  That is TA motion coming off the case
and charge running out from an eternity of lies.

      GUARDIAN DICOMS

      Guardian dicoms are those dicoms that make it hard or impossible
for a pc to make case gain.

      Case gain is basically recognizing that one was completely wrong,
and getting right.

      But the pc finds out he was SO wrong, he develops a problem about
it, and thus can not change his mind any more.

      His willingness and acceptance levels on being wrong can be easily
exceeded.

      "If I am a god, why would I have DISGRACED myself so?"

       NO GRACE    - SOME GRACE
       NO DISGRACE - SOME DISGRACE

       "I will never live it down."

      He still doesn't really know WHAT he will never live down, but he
is quite sure he won't!

      Thus during auditing the pc will run into the 'wall of
preposterousness', and suddenly go flying out of session.

      He just ran out of permission to go any further because 'this is
all nuts you know.'

       NO PERMISSION - SOME PERMISSION
       NO FORBIDDEN  - SOME FORBIDDEN

      He will be able to audit this life which seems 'normal' to him, but
ask him to take it earlier similar back to whole track and you will get
balk.

       NO NORMAL     - SOME NORMAL
       NO PARANORMAL - SOME PARANORMAL

      It is quite acceptable to him that his conscious Self is made of
pieces and parts tick tocking away, but the idea that his Self is the
fundamental indivisible stuff of which the AllThatIs is made gives him
the willies.

      "It's too good to be true, I would just die of shame..."

      Maybe he will go whole track for a few seconds, but then something
will creep up on him and say "Hey I don't BELIEVE in whole track, this
is REDICULOUS, how can I be auditing this stuff?!"

       NO BELIEF    - SOME BELIEF
       NO DISBELIEF - SOME DISBELIEF

       NO REDICULOUS - SOME REDICULOUS

      At that moment the needle packs up, the TA freezes, and that's the
end of that session, until the guardian dicom that was restimulated is
addressed AS IT SELF.

      He has a problem in choice.  If the world is a dream, and the pc
has lived before this life, then he had to have made a CHOICE to come
into the body and become mortal.

      NO CHOICE - SOME CHOICE

      But try as me may he doesn't remember that choice, nor any part of
the CONTEXT surrounding it.

      Why on Earth would anyone chose to BECOME a body?

      Having and owning one like a dog might be nice, riding one around
like a horse could be fun, but to BECOME ONE and forget everything that
isn't a body, and toss one's sovereignty out the door to the dust and
the winds?

      That's NUTS!

      So

      NO NUTS - SOME NUTS

      becomes a guardian dicom.

      These things are so powerful, that when he runs into them they
DEFINE truth for him.

      There is certainly no arguing with them.

      After crashing into the wall of preposterousness at full speed
while trying to go exterior, he will come away KNOWING that
exteriorization is preposterous!

      It's a kind of knowing by emoting, it surely isn't scientific, but
your pc isn't interested in scientific rigor at that moment, he just
wants to salvage some respect for himself which he can't do by giving
any credence at all to this nonsense!

       NO RESPECT  - SOME RESPECT
       NO CONTEMPT - SOME CONTEMPT

       NO NONSENSE - SOME NONSENSE
       NO SENSE    - SOME SENSE

       NO CREDIBLE   - SOME CREDIBLE
       NO INCREDIBLE - SOME INCREDIBLE

      There are a lot of guardian dicoms.

      Every time your pc runs into one of these trying to go wholetrack,
or imagining being out of his body, there will be a phrase associated
with it that will hit the pc BEFORE the knowing by emoting.

      By giving credence to the phrase, going into wonder and question
asking about whether it is right or not, he thus amplifies the feeling
that goes with it into a overwhelm of acceptance.

      Idea will come up such as:

      "It's too good to be true.

      "I would die from shock if I found out..."

      "I would go SPLAT all over native state..."

      "I would go crazy if it were true."

      "I will die of chagrin and shame."

      He can't stand the thought of his hope going soaring up into the
sky, just to be crushed down to the ground again.

       NO OPERATION - SOME OPERATION
       NO CRUSH     - SOME CRUSH

      "How would I ever live it down, I was God in carnation and here I
thought for the longest time I was a hyena!"

      To some it is not clear whether a hyena will ever live it down, but
to be frank, just have them mockup God incarnating as a dung beetle or
dingle berry on Roland's ass.

      They will eventually cognite that everyone is an asshole bar none,
no matter how high their pedestal in the pecking order of admiration.

      They will cognite that Source sources what Source is not, and thus
God incarnates as what God is not, and yet God loves himself one and
all.

      It's a new view.

      Here are some remaining guardian dicoms which you must look out for
when you pc balks in session from making real case gain.

       NO DOUBT - SOME DOUBT

       NO CERTAINTY   - SOME CERTAINTY
       NO UNCERTAINTY - SOME UNCERTAINTY

       NO DECISION   - SOME DECISION
       NO INDECISION - SOME INDECISION

       NO POSSIBILITY   - SOME POSSIBILITY
       NO IMPOSSIBILITY - SOME IMPOSSIBILITY

       NO NATURAL   - SOME NATURAL
       NO UNNATURAL - SOME UNNATURAL

       NO PERMISSION - SOME PERMISSION
       NO FORBIDDEN  - SOME FORBIDDEN

       "Fools rush in, where Angels dare not tread, and Gods go
screaming for their Mama." - Adore

       NO FOOL   - SOME FOOL
       NO WISDOM - SOME WISDOM

       NO WONDER   - SOME WONDER

       NO QUESTION - SOME QUESTION
       NO ANSWER   - SOME ANSWER

       NO ABILITY   - SOME ABILITY
       NO INABILITY - SOME INABILITY

       NO WILLINGESS   - SOME WILLINGNESS
       NO UNWILLINGESS - SOME UNWILLINGNESS

       NO REDICULOUS   - SOME REDICULOUS

       NO PREPOSTEROUS - SOME PREPOSTEROUS

       NO DIVINE - SOME DIVINE
       NO HOLY   - SOME HOLY

       NO LUDICROUS - SOME LUDICROUS

       NO TRAGEDY  - SOME TRAGEDY
       NO TRAVESTY - SOME TRAVESTY

       NO MIRACLE - SOME MIRACLE

       NO FAITH         - SOME FAITH
       NO FAITHLESSNESS - SOME FAITHLESSNESS

       NO UNDREAMED DREAM COME TRUE - SOME UNDREAMED DREAM COME TRUE

       NO BETRAYAL - SOME BETRAYAL

       NO CONFRONT - SOME CONFRONT

       NO FLINCH - SOME FLINCH
       NO CRINGE - SOME CRINGE

       NO COURAGE   - SOME COURAGE
       NO COWARDICE - SOME COWARDICE

       NO BELIEF    - SOME BELIEF
       NO DISBELIEF - SOME DISBELIEF

       NO DESIRE - SOME DESIRE

       NO HOPE - SOME HOPE

       NO DARING   - SOME DARING
       NO DARE NOT - SOME DARE NOT

       NO STUPIFYINGLY ASTOUNDING - SOME STUPIFYINGLY ASTOUNDING

       NO DANGER - SOME DANGER
       NO SAFETY - SOME SAFETY

       Operation of dicoms generates power.

      This last one is the warp core, but won't run until all other
guardians are cleared.

      Games that have no danger or safety are not games, they are a
dance.

      Thus in trying to reoptimize a pc's games, you are trying to move
danger/safety upscale to where real power and courage can be generated.

      That's where the E-meter starts to float and the pc has his proof.

      Pray that the poor auditor can stand it.

      Homer


======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Sun Aug  2 16:06:37 EDT 2015
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore618.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but 
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFVvnhNURT1lqxE3HERArWVAJ9Hns2DkvQP7XAWwi/MFfB3m1vVQQCdF4r/
LQaw1tm0FTTHipWTL2EI7yY=
=2loV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the HomerWSmith-L mailing list