ADORE756 (fwd)

HomerWSmith at HomerWSmith at
Sat Aug 15 22:32:54 EDT 2015

Hash: SHA1


In article 
<d2f231f3-1d5b-44f6-a475-fce8ac8c3d9f at> 
a poster wrote about comments made by Richard Ford.  The poster 

> Homer is quite right, you use strawmen... You have refused and still
> refuse till this day to engage in any serious discussion or
> investigation about these matters.


      Richard Ford is being a BT, a Body Thetan or Cluster.

      Run the following, point at him accusatively, holding his eyes at
all times with yours, and say:


      What are you?

      Who are you?

      How many are you?

      1 trillion?  10 trillion?  100 trillion?  more?

      You are real people!"

      Repeat any line that produces standstill, eyes wide or cooperation.

      The how many question may have to go up into the 10**50 or higher.

      He has only one point he is making to us.

      If all this stuff is true, how come we can't/won't give him
evidence on the matter via demonstration of paranormal 'powers'.

      For him that evidence would have to be physical plane evidence
only, weapons of war stuff, as he himself couldn't stand the light of
emotional, mental or spiritual plane evidence that he couldn't share or
use to dominate others.

      Now that is fine, but I don't have physical plane powers, except
make myself sick almost at will, and I won't have those powers until my
spiritual, mental and emotional plane powers come to full fruition.

      Lots and lots of evidences for those, sometimes I have to slap them
down like bugs crawling all over my inner space.

      It's a top down process.

      Now if and when I do get physical plane powers, in this or some
future life, the question remains whether Richard Ford would pass any
enforced security test of the time on the matter.

      He certainly wouldn't now.

      Approach is everything, contempt doesn't cut.  No one OWES him a
demonstration.  Nor does anyone owe him being quiet, although we do
admonish against claiming to have physical plane powers in public unless
you are prepared to demonstrate.

      As for physical evidence, lots of people have evidence, but it is
not replicatable because of the danger to being that able in this
universe at this time.  No matter how OT a person is, there are millions
of ex carnate beings way more OT than he is who would like to keep him
on his cross.

      That RICHARD FORD has zero evidence of any kind giving him an
inkling of the possibility of a spiritual world, indicates his own
shallowness and possible opposition to eternal life.

      There are no chronic innocent victims here, and to live a whole
life, do all those drugs, have all those near death experiences, all
those sleep dreams, all those tears and laughter at the bottom of the
well, all that blinding love and guilt, and not have one single inkling
that this life may not be all that is, is just so shallow as to be

      It's mostly a light and emotional shut off case.


======================= ========================
Posted: Sat Aug 15 22:32:54 EDT 2015
Send mail to saying help
================== ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but 
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)


More information about the HomerWSmith-L mailing list