ADORE101 / Question?????
HomerWSmith at lightlink.com
HomerWSmith at lightlink.com
Thu Aug 27 15:37:52 EDT 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
GOOD AND EVIL
Correct, these are templated implants, so each person has their own
concept of good and evil/bad, and who is good or evil.
Mere opposition between parties might suffice to cause each to think
the other is bad.
Like one wants to put up a park and the other wants to put up a
But two foot ball teams INVITE each other in to the game so
they CAN fight. They hardly consider each other evil.
But beyond that you have to figure out what core good and core evil
mean, and if they even exist.
For example there are those that are sensitive to other's pain
and act accordingly. Then there are those who are more separated and
thus act more selfishly at other's expense.
Then there are those who have declared you an enemy, perhaps because
they think you have declared them an enemy first, and thus they fair
game you, and you fair game them.
Evil is who we wish didn't exist.
We didn't invite it in, and we would invite it out FOREVER if we could.
Where the invite is missing or denied you have a serious problem in the
What wouldn't, couldn't, shouldn't you EVER invite into your dream?
An entire rundown could be built around:
"Get the idea of inviting something or someone into your dream."
"Get the idea of not inviting something or someone into your dream."
E/P returned sense of responsibility for and control over preclear's
condition and increased ability and willingness to put things there and
not put things there.
"Worse than evil is good that fears evil.
Even assholes take a break once in a while, the petty good never
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth, and Peace, Internet, Ithaca NY
homer at lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
> I have been thinking about this post from yesterday:
> "It is good to do good to good.
> " It is good to do evil to evil."
> What do you mean by the above?
> What do you mean by evil?
> I see two sides to looking at this?
> Is it evil to take out (shoot) a lunatic with a machine gun shooting up a school?
> Or is that good?
> The other side is:
> Doing evil to evil will create a non life games condition.
> Which only creates a downward dwindling spiral into a no win- everyone lose-
> > THE DICOM TORTILLA
> > DICOM = DIchotomy of Comparable and Opposite Magnitude.
> > People have themselves wrapped up in dicoms like meatballs inside a
> > tortilla.
> > "It is good to do good to good.
> > It is good to do evil to evil.
> > It is evil to do evil to good.
> > It is evil to do good to evil."
> > "Love loves love.
> > Love hates hate.
> > Hate hates love.
> > Hate loves Hate."
> > Run the tortilla by spotting:
> > "Spot some love loving love.
> > Spot some love hating hate.
> > etc.
> > Also don't forget odd tortilla items that may not make immediate
> > sense:
> > "Spot some love hating love.
> > Spot some hate hating hate."
> > Run until deep fried in butter and golden brown.
> > Homer
> > - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
> > (607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
> > homer at lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
> > ================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
> > Sat Aug 22 12:06:01 EDT 2015
> > WEB: http://www.clearing.org
> > BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
> > FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore101.memo
> > Send mail to archive at lightlink.com saying help in body
> > =========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
> > Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
> > Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
> > Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
> > Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
> > but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> > iD8DBQFV2J3pURT1lqxE3HERAsNHAJ4nA2TjMT27y9fkDKdPPkUD8m6QQgCgo0lW
> > oG5Ph/2KgFPrNTzh8t8Wjm8=
> > =RJ6y
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > _______________________________________________
> > HomerWSmith-L mailing list
> > HomerWSmith-L at mailman.lightlink.com
> > http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/homerwsmith-l
======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Thu Aug 27 15:37:51 EDT 2015
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the HomerWSmith-L