Homer Wilson Smith
HomerWSmith at lightlink.com
Tue Jan 29 14:12:11 EST 2019
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
GOD MAN WOMAN CHILD
Oriental wisdom gives us yin and yang, male and female etc.
They are drawn as two complementing figures that make a whole.
Adore takes exception to this for two basic reasons.
First the figures are drawn as if they are equal in size.
Secondly Adore claims there are 4 aspects rather than 2.
The 4 aspects form concentric rings of support much as the dynamics
are presented in Hymn of Asia.
Child is in the middle, surrounded by woman, surrounded by man,
surrounded by God.
But then the God is surrounded again by the child at the next level
out. So the concentricity goes outward almost forever, as one expands
into bigger and bigger game spheres.
There are physical women in male phases, and men in female phases,
and both in child and god phases of their particular endeavors.
There are also men in higher and lower grades, so although both are
male phase, one is seriously advanced over the other, being multiple
groups of 4 ahead of the other.
Notice that a woman in a higher group of 4 is more advanced than
ANYONE in a lower group of 4, God, Man, Woman or Child.
Adore does make a statement about dependency between each of the
phases within a group which is highly unacceptable to those that like to
think God = man = woman = child.
The child is more dependent on the female than the female is
dependent on the child. The female takes her purpose from the child
(the child's needs).
The female (with child) is more dependent on the male than the male
is on the female. The male takes his purpose from the female.
The male (with female with child) is more dependent on the God than
the God is on the male. The God takes his purpose from the male.
The God is more dependent on the child at the next level up, than
the child is dependent on the God at the previous level down. The
higher child takes his purpose from the lower God.
But the real point of controversy is Adore's statement that the 4
phases are about relative ability within each group.
The woman is more able than the child.
The man is more able than the woman.
The God is more able than the man.
The child at the next level up is more able than the God at the
previous level down.
If you think of child, woman, man and God as phases of mastery in
any particular area rather than physical bodies, it really does make a
lot of sense.
From this point of view, there are as many women who are more able
than men, as there are men who are more able than women.
But there are also children more able than men, women or Gods.
The being enters a brand new area in a state of total
irresponsibility, he has no clue what is going on, and had no prior
cause in it. In order to master his childhood, he has to master that
scene of total irresponsibility. Children learn by mimicry.
The being then needs to learn how to defend, not only themselves
but other child phase beings in their care. This is the woman phase
which when mastered becomes master of defense. Women learn through
The being then needs to learn how to offend, how to seek danger
before it find him. This is the male phase which when mastered becomes
master of offense. Men learn through counterpoint.
The being then needs to learn how to create the game sphere he is
in. This is the God phase which when mastered becomes master of total
responsibility. From this the God can then create, find or enter the
next sphere of total irresponsibility at the next level up. The God
seeks a new beat.
"Mimicry, harmony, counterpoint and newbeat are musical terms
relating to the CO JAM of life." - Adore
Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer at lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com
Wed Feb 21 00:04:10 EST 2007
================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Tue Jan 29 12:00:04 EST 2019
Send mail to archive at lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the HomerWSmith-L