ADORE3

HomerWSmith at lightlink.com HomerWSmith at lightlink.com
Thu Nov 14 14:09:33 EST 2019


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


     HAVE FOR A WHILE, LOSE FOREVER

     It turns out things are more serious than I thought.

     Your average human being is suffering PTSD just from being alive,
based on

     "What ever you can get you can't keep, you can have it for a while, 
but then you must lose it forever."

     This leads to "better not get" so you don't end up in "don't have
forever."

     Homer


- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY
homer at lightlink.com  Is that too much to ask?   http://www.lightlink.com

On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, homer at lightlink.com wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> JEANETTE ROGERS (HERE-I-YAM at email.msn.com) wrote:
>
>> Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
>> Hi Homer,
>
>> I'm afraid much of the above is over my head.  I couldn't quite relate to
>> it.
>
>    Sure you can, remember a time you 'will *NEVER* forgive' someone.
>
>     That's a forever and thus a dramatization, it brings DRAMA to a
> situation rather than peace, vanishment and void.
>
>> But one thing for sure, there definitely is something wrong with "forever."
>> It seems to be a bit late on the track to be really basic, more like a 3rd
>> postulate or something.
>
>     It's an effort to make sure something NEVER happens again, or
> ALWAYS happens again, its an effort to create a permanent PERSISTENCE.
>
>     Run
>
>    "What would it be ok to have be for just a while."
>    "What would it not be ok to have be for just a while."
>
>> Or, to put it another way, "forever" is possibly all the more devious
>> because it harmonizes with (or is a mockery of) a theta truth.
>
>     Yes, it is an effort to bring the non temporal eternality of
> static into being as a termporal eternity of MEST.
>
>     Something forever is hell forever.
>
>     Nothing forever is death forever.
>
>     Cycling between something and nothing, manifest and unmanifest
> forever is "fair chosen peace via hell and high water".
>
>     In other words you can (willingly) have something as long as you
> can have nothing, and you can have nothing as long as you can have
> something, but if you HAVE to have something forever, then you begin
> to seek nothing forever, and if you HAVE to have nothing forever you
> begin to seek something forever, and see saw between the two
> endlessly, life after life.
>
>     Hell forever - > Death Forever -> Hell forever -> Death forever
>
>     Meatball -> Christian -> Meatball -> Christian.
>
>     Homer
>
> ================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
> Thu Nov 14 12:00:04 EST 2019
> WEB:  http://www.clearing.org
> BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
> FTP:  ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore3.memo
> Send mail to archive at lightlink.com saying help in body
> =========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
> Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
> Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
> Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
> Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
> but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFdzYgUURT1lqxE3HERAnwDAJ9RdwdvrRVKO9jj3iBcvA0M3G3P7QCfZXC7
> vgScfZ+WpJApH/MbugG72i4=
> =ATSS
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

======================= http://www.clearing.org ========================
Posted: Thu Nov 14 14:09:33 EST 2019
ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore3.memo
Send mail to archive.com saying help
================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning but 
Not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFdzaZtURT1lqxE3HERAkqcAKChaYCzXpLQaTGm1QVYVS9nCY3bRgCg0zru
kErzPdpQ9HqHfXelwp4yqjw=
=rxc9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the HomerWSmith-L mailing list